On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:14:37AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote: > > Agreed, perhaps Fenghua can consider that in his patchset. It would > > help align life cycles as well. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/30/910> > > Seems we depend on each other: my patch defines pasid in mm_struct. > I can free PASID in your detach() function.
Looks like this should go into the same series. I also don't see any good reason to have the pasid in the x86-specific context vs the common mm_struct. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
