Greetings; I recently noticed this change via the linux-next tree.
It may not be possible to edit at this late date, but the change description refers to PROT_KERNEL, which is a symbol which does not appear to exist; perhaps PAGE_KERNEL was meant? The mismatch caused me and a couple other folks some confusion briefly until we decided it was supposed to be PAGE_KERNEL; if it's not too late, editing the description to clarify so would be nice. Many thanks. John Dorminy On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:15 AM Wei Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The pgprot argument to __vmalloc is always PROT_KERNEL now, so remove > > it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]> [hyperv] > > Acked-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]> [erofs] > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 3 +-- > [...] > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c > > index 5a4b363ba67b..a3d689dfc745 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c > > @@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ static int hv_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu) > > * not be stopped in the case of CPU offlining and the VM will > hang. > > */ > > if (!*hvp) { > > - *hvp = __vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, > > - PAGE_KERNEL); > > + *hvp = __vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); > > } > > Acked-by: Wei Liu <[email protected]> > >
_______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
