Hi Jean,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Jean-Philippe Brucker
> Sent: 02 June 2020 10:39
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 21/24] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add stall support for
> platform devices
>
> Hi Shameer,
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 12:42:15PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> wrote:
> > > /* IRQ and event handlers */
> > > +static int arm_smmu_handle_evt(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64
> > > +*evt) {
> > > + int ret;
> > > + u32 perm = 0;
> > > + struct arm_smmu_master *master;
> > > + bool ssid_valid = evt[0] & EVTQ_0_SSV;
> > > + u8 type = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_ID, evt[0]);
> > > + u32 sid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SID, evt[0]);
> > > + struct iommu_fault_event fault_evt = { };
> > > + struct iommu_fault *flt = &fault_evt.fault;
> > > +
> > > + /* Stage-2 is always pinned at the moment */
> > > + if (evt[1] & EVTQ_1_S2)
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + master = arm_smmu_find_master(smmu, sid);
> > > + if (!master)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (evt[1] & EVTQ_1_READ)
> > > + perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_READ;
> > > + else
> > > + perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE;
> > > +
> > > + if (evt[1] & EVTQ_1_EXEC)
> > > + perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC;
> > > +
> > > + if (evt[1] & EVTQ_1_PRIV)
> > > + perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_PRIV;
> > > +
> > > + if (evt[1] & EVTQ_1_STALL) {
> > > + flt->type = IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQ;
> > > + flt->prm = (struct iommu_fault_page_request) {
> > > + .flags = IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_LAST_PAGE,
> > > + .pasid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SSID, evt[0]),
> > > + .grpid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_STAG, evt[1]),
> > > + .perm = perm,
> > > + .addr = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_2_ADDR, evt[2]),
> > > + };
> > > +
> >
> > > + if (ssid_valid)
> > > + flt->prm.flags |=
> IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID;
> >
> > Do we need to set this for STALL mode only support? I had an issue
> > with this being set on a vSVA POC based on our D06 zip device(which is
> > a "fake " pci dev that supports STALL mode but no PRI). The issue is,
> > CMDQ_OP_RESUME doesn't have any ssid or SSV params and works on sid
> and stag only.
>
> I don't understand the problem, arm_smmu_page_response() doesn't set SSID
> or SSV when sending a CMDQ_OP_RESUME. Could you detail the flow of a stall
> event and RESUME command in your prototype? Are you getting issues with
> the host driver or the guest driver?
The issue is on the host side iommu_page_response(). The flow is something like
below.
Stall: Host:-
arm_smmu_handle_evt()
iommu_report_device_fault()
vfio_pci_iommu_dev_fault_handler()
Stall: Qemu:-
vfio_dma_fault_notifier_handler()
inject_faults()
smmuv3_inject_faults()
Stall: Guest:-
arm_smmu_handle_evt()
iommu_report_device_fault()
iommu_queue_iopf
...
iopf_handle_group()
iopf_handle_single()
handle_mm_fault()
iopf_complete()
iommu_page_response()
arm_smmu_page_response()
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(CMDQ_OP_RESUME)
Resume: Qemu:-
smmuv3_cmdq_consume(SMMU_CMD_RESUME)
smmuv3_notify_page_resp()
vfio:ioctl(page_response) --> struct iommu_page_response is filled
with only version, grpid and code.
Resume: Host:-
ioctl(page_response)
iommu_page_response() --> fails as the pending req has PASID_VALID flag
set and it checks for a match.
arm_smmu_page_response()
Hope the above is clear.
> We do need to forward the SSV flag all the way to the guest driver, so the
> guest
> can find the faulting address space using the SSID. Once the guest handled the
> fault, then we don't send the SSID back to the host as part of the RESUME
> command.
True, the guest requires SSV flag to handle the page fault. But, as shown in the
flow above, the issue is on the host side iommu_page_response() where it
searches for a matching pending req based on pasid. Not sure we can bypass
that and call arm_smmu_page_response() directly but then have to delete the
pending req from the list as well.
Please let me know if there is a better way to handle the host side page
response.
Thanks,
Shameer
> Thanks,
> Jean
>
> > Hence, it is difficult for
> > Qemu SMMUv3 to populate this fields while preparing a page response. I
> > can see that this flag is being checked in iopf_handle_single() (patch
> > 04/24) as well. For POC, I used a temp fix[1] to work around this. Please
> > let
> me know your thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> >
> > 1.
> > https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commit/99ff96146e924055f38d97a
> > 5897e4becfa378d15
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
