Hi Kevin,

On 7/6/20 9:47 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 8:26 AM

After a page request is handled, software must response the device which
raised the page request with the handling result. This is done through

'response' is a noun.

Yes.


the iommu ops.page_response if the request was reported to outside of
vendor iommu driver through iommu_report_device_fault(). This adds the
VT-d implementation of page_response ops.

Co-developed-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
---
  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c |  1 +
  drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c   | 74
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  3 ++
  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index de17952ed133..7eb29167e8f9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -6057,6 +6057,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = {
        .sva_bind               = intel_svm_bind,
        .sva_unbind             = intel_svm_unbind,
        .sva_get_pasid          = intel_svm_get_pasid,
+       .page_response          = intel_svm_page_response,
  #endif
  };

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 08c58c2b1a06..1c7d8a9ea124 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -1078,3 +1078,77 @@ int intel_svm_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *sva)

        return pasid;
  }
+
+int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev,
+                           struct iommu_fault_event *evt,
+                           struct iommu_page_response *msg)
+{
+       struct iommu_fault_page_request *prm;
+       struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
+       struct intel_iommu *iommu;
+       struct intel_svm *svm;
+       bool private_present;
+       bool pasid_present;
+       bool last_page;
+       u8 bus, devfn;
+       int ret = 0;
+       u16 sid;
+
+       if (!dev || !dev_is_pci(dev))
+               return -ENODEV;

but we didn't do same check when reporting fault?

For now, we only support PCI devices, so I will add this check in report
as well.


+
+       iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
+       if (!iommu)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       if (!msg || !evt)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
+
+       prm = &evt->fault.prm;
+       sid = PCI_DEVID(bus, devfn);
+       pasid_present = prm->flags &
IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID;
+       private_present = prm->flags &
IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PRIV_DATA;
+       last_page = prm->flags &
IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_LAST_PAGE;
+
+       if (pasid_present) {
+               if (prm->pasid == 0 || prm->pasid >= PASID_MAX) {
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       goto out;
+               }
+
+               ret = pasid_to_svm_sdev(dev, prm->pasid, &svm, &sdev);
+               if (ret || !sdev) {
+                       ret = -ENODEV;
+                       goto out;
+               }
+       }

what about pasid_present==0? Do we support recoverable fault now
with this patch?

For now, we don't support reporting a prq without pasid to outside.
prq_event_thread() handles such requests explicitly. I will add a
check in response ops.


and who guarantees that the external fault handler (e.g. guest)
cannot do bad thing with this interface, e.g. by specifying a PASID
belonging to other guests (when Scalable IOV is enabled)?

I will check below if the response is from user space.

(svm->mm ==  get_task_mm(current))


Thanks
Kevin

Best regards,
baolu

+
+       /*
+        * Per VT-d spec. v3.0 ch7.7, system software must respond
+        * with page group response if private data is present (PDP)
+        * or last page in group (LPIG) bit is set. This is an
+        * additional VT-d requirement beyond PCI ATS spec.
+        */
+       if (last_page || private_present) {
+               struct qi_desc desc;
+
+               desc.qw0 = QI_PGRP_PASID(prm->pasid) | QI_PGRP_DID(sid)
|
+                               QI_PGRP_PASID_P(pasid_present) |
+                               QI_PGRP_PDP(private_present) |
+                               QI_PGRP_RESP_CODE(msg->code) |
+                               QI_PGRP_RESP_TYPE;
+               desc.qw1 = QI_PGRP_IDX(prm->grpid) |
QI_PGRP_LPIG(last_page);
+               desc.qw2 = 0;
+               desc.qw3 = 0;
+               if (private_present)
+                       memcpy(&desc.qw2, prm->private_data,
+                              sizeof(prm->private_data));
+
+               qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
+       }
+out:
+       mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
+       return ret;
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
index fc2cfc3db6e1..bf6009a344f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
+++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
@@ -741,6 +741,9 @@ struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind(struct device
*dev, struct mm_struct *mm,
                                 void *drvdata);
  void intel_svm_unbind(struct iommu_sva *handle);
  int intel_svm_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle);
+int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fault_event
*evt,
+                           struct iommu_page_response *msg);
+
  struct svm_dev_ops;

  struct intel_svm_dev {
--
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to