Yi,
On 7/12/20 1:21 PM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> Recent years, mediated device pass-through framework (e.g. vfio-mdev)
> is used to achieve flexible device sharing across domains (e.g. VMs).
> Also there are hardware assisted mediated pass-through solutions from
> platform vendors. e.g. Intel VT-d scalable mode which supports Intel
> Scalable I/O Virtualization technology. Such mdevs are called IOMMU-
> backed mdevs as there are IOMMU enforced DMA isolation for such mdevs.
there is IOMMU enforced DMA isolation
> In kernel, IOMMU-backed mdevs are exposed to IOMMU layer by aux-domain
> concept, which means mdevs are protected by an iommu domain which is
> auxiliary to the domain that the kernel driver primarily uses for DMA
> API. Details can be found in the KVM presentation as below:
>
> https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/\
> Hardware-Assisted-Mediated-Pass-Through-with-VFIO-Kevin-Tian-Intel.pdf
>
> This patch extends NESTING_IOMMU ops to IOMMU-backed mdev devices. The
> main requirement is to use the auxiliary domain associated with mdev.
So as a result vSVM becomes functional for scalable mode mediated
devices, right?
>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> CC: Jun Tian <jun.j.t...@intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> *) check the iommu_device to ensure the handling mdev is IOMMU-backed
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 960cc59..f1f1ae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -2373,20 +2373,41 @@ static int vfio_iommu_resv_refresh(struct vfio_iommu
> *iommu,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct device *vfio_get_iommu_device(struct vfio_group *group,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + if (group->mdev_group)
> + return vfio_mdev_get_iommu_device(dev);
> + else
> + return dev;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_dev_bind_gpasid_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
> unsigned long arg = *(unsigned long *)dc->data;
> + struct device *iommu_device;
> +
> + iommu_device = vfio_get_iommu_device(dc->group, dev);
> + if (!iommu_device)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - return iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(dc->domain, dev, (void __user *)arg);
> + return iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(dc->domain, iommu_device,
> + (void __user *)arg);
> }
>
> static int vfio_dev_unbind_gpasid_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
> unsigned long arg = *(unsigned long *)dc->data;
> + struct device *iommu_device;
>
> - iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(dc->domain, dev, (void __user *)arg);
> + iommu_device = vfio_get_iommu_device(dc->group, dev);
> + if (!iommu_device)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(dc->domain, iommu_device,
> + (void __user *)arg);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2395,8 +2416,13 @@ static int __vfio_dev_unbind_gpasid_fn(struct device
> *dev, void *data)
> struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
> struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *unbind_data =
> (struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *)dc->data;
> + struct device *iommu_device;
> +
> + iommu_device = vfio_get_iommu_device(dc->group, dev);
> + if (!iommu_device)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - __iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(dc->domain, dev, unbind_data);
> + __iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(dc->domain, iommu_device, unbind_data);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3077,8 +3103,13 @@ static int vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn(struct device
> *dev, void *data)
> {
> struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
> unsigned long arg = *(unsigned long *)dc->data;
> + struct device *iommu_device;
> +
> + iommu_device = vfio_get_iommu_device(dc->group, dev);
> + if (!iommu_device)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, (void __user *)arg);
> + iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, iommu_device, (void __user *)arg);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
Besides,
Looks grood to me
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
Eric
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
