On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 12:47 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > When allocating coherent pool memory for an IOMMU mapping we don't care > about the DMA mask. Move the guess for the initial GFP mask into the > dma_direct_alloc_pages and pass dma_coherent_ok as a function pointer > argument so that it doesn't get applied to the IOMMU case. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 4 +- > include/linux/dma-direct.h | 3 - > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 5 +- > kernel/dma/direct.c | 13 ++-- > kernel/dma/pool.c | 114 +++++++++++++++--------------------- > 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) >
[...]
> -static inline struct gen_pool *dma_get_safer_pool(struct gen_pool *bad_pool)
> +static struct page *__dma_alloc_from_pool(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> + struct gen_pool *pool, void **cpu_addr,
> + bool (*phys_addr_ok)(struct device *, phys_addr_t, size_t))
> {
> - if (bad_pool == atomic_pool_kernel)
> - return atomic_pool_dma32 ? : atomic_pool_dma;
> + unsigned long addr;
> + phys_addr_t phys;
>
> - if (bad_pool == atomic_pool_dma32)
> - return atomic_pool_dma;
> + addr = gen_pool_alloc(pool, size);
> + if (!addr)
> + return NULL;
>
> - return NULL;
> -}
> + phys = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(pool, addr);
> + if (!phys_addr_ok(dev, phys, size)) {
Shoudn't we check if phys_addr_ok() != NULL?
Regards,
Nicolas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
