On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:45:24 -0700
Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com> wrote:

> This patch allows userspace to request PASID allocation/free, e.g. when
> serving the request from the guest.
> 
> PASIDs that are not freed by userspace are automatically freed when the
> IOASID set is destroyed when process exits.
> 
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.y....@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v6 -> v7:
> *) current VFIO returns allocated pasid via signed int, thus VFIO UAPI
>    can only support 31 bits pasid. If user space gives min,max which is
>    wider than 31 bits, should fail the allocation or free request.
> 
> v5 -> v6:
> *) address comments from Eric against v5. remove the alloc/free helper.
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> *) address comments from Eric Auger.
> *) the comments for the PASID_FREE request is addressed in patch 5/15 of
>    this series.
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> *) address comments from v3, except the below comment against the range
>    of PASID_FREE request. needs more help on it.
>     "> +if (req.range.min > req.range.max)  
> 
>      Is it exploitable that a user can spin the kernel for a long time in
>      the case of a free by calling this with [0, MAX_UINT] regardless of
>      their actual allocations?"
>     https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200702151832.048b4...@x1.home/
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> *) move the vfio_mm related code to be a seprate module
> *) use a single structure for alloc/free, could support a range of PASIDs
> *) fetch vfio_mm at group_attach time instead of at iommu driver open time
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/Kconfig            |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 76 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c       | 10 ++++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h            |  6 ++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h       | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> index 3d8a108..95d90c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  config VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1
>       tristate
>       depends on VFIO
> +     select VFIO_PASID if (X86)
>       default n
>  
>  config VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 3c0048b..bd4b668 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
>       bool                            dirty_page_tracking;
>       bool                            pinned_page_dirty_scope;
>       struct iommu_nesting_info       *nesting_info;
> +     struct vfio_mm                  *vmm;
>  };
>  
>  struct vfio_domain {
> @@ -2000,6 +2001,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_iova_insert_copy(struct 
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  
>  static void vfio_iommu_release_nesting_info(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>  {
> +     if (iommu->vmm) {
> +             vfio_mm_put(iommu->vmm);
> +             iommu->vmm = NULL;
> +     }
> +
>       kfree(iommu->nesting_info);
>       iommu->nesting_info = NULL;
>  }
> @@ -2127,6 +2133,26 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void 
> *iommu_data,
>                                           iommu->nesting_info);
>               if (ret)
>                       goto out_detach;
> +
> +             if (iommu->nesting_info->features &
> +                                     IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_SYSWIDE_PASID) {
> +                     struct vfio_mm *vmm;
> +                     struct ioasid_set *set;
> +
> +                     vmm = vfio_mm_get_from_task(current);
> +                     if (IS_ERR(vmm)) {
> +                             ret = PTR_ERR(vmm);
> +                             goto out_detach;
> +                     }
> +                     iommu->vmm = vmm;
> +
> +                     set = vfio_mm_ioasid_set(vmm);
> +                     ret = iommu_domain_set_attr(domain->domain,
> +                                                 DOMAIN_ATTR_IOASID_SET,
> +                                                 set);
> +                     if (ret)
> +                             goto out_detach;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       /* Get aperture info */
> @@ -2908,6 +2934,54 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(struct 
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
>       return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +                                       unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +     struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request req;
> +     unsigned long minsz;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request, range);
> +
> +     if (copy_from_user(&req, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> +             return -EFAULT;
> +
> +     if (req.argsz < minsz || (req.flags & ~VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Current VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST only supports at most
> +      * 31 bits PASID. The min,max value from userspace should
> +      * not exceed 31 bits.

Please describe the source of this restriction.  I think it's due to
using the ioctl return value to return the PASID, thus excluding the
negative values, but aren't we actually restricted to pasid_bits
exposed in the nesting_info?  If this is just a sanity test for the API
then why are we defining VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS in the uapi header,
which causes conflicting information to the user... which do they
honor?  Should we instead verify that pasid_bits matches our API scheme
when configuring the nested domain and then let the ioasid allocator
reject requests outside of the range?

> +      */
> +     if (req.range.min > req.range.max ||
> +         req.range.min > (1 << VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS) ||
> +         req.range.max > (1 << VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS))

Off by one, >= for the bit test.

> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +     if (!iommu->vmm) {
> +             mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +     }
> +
> +     switch (req.flags & VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK) {
> +     case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID:
> +             ret = vfio_pasid_alloc(iommu->vmm, req.range.min,
> +                                    req.range.max);
> +             break;
> +     case VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID:
> +             vfio_pasid_free_range(iommu->vmm, req.range.min,
> +                                   req.range.max);
> +             ret = 0;

Set the initial value when it's declared?

> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>                                  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -2924,6 +2998,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>               return vfio_iommu_type1_unmap_dma(iommu, arg);
>       case VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES:
>               return vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(iommu, arg);
> +     case VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST:
> +             return vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request(iommu, arg);
>       default:
>               return -ENOTTY;
>       }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> index 44ecdd5..0ec4660 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_pasid.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
>  {
>       kref_put_mutex(&vmm->kref, vfio_mm_release, &vfio_mm_lock);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_put);
>  
>  static void vfio_mm_get(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
>  {
> @@ -113,6 +114,13 @@ struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct 
> *task)
>       mmput(mm);
>       return vmm;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_get_from_task);
> +
> +struct ioasid_set *vfio_mm_ioasid_set(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> +{
> +     return vmm->ioasid_set;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_mm_ioasid_set);
>  
>  /*
>   * Find PASID within @min and @max
> @@ -201,6 +209,7 @@ int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int 
> max)
>  
>       return pasid;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_alloc);
>  
>  void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
>                          ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max)
> @@ -217,6 +226,7 @@ void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
>               vfio_remove_pasid(vmm, vid);
>       mutex_unlock(&vmm->pasid_lock);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pasid_free_range);
>  
>  static int __init vfio_pasid_init(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 31472a9..5c3d7a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vfio_mm;
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PASID)
>  extern struct vfio_mm *vfio_mm_get_from_task(struct task_struct *task);
>  extern void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
> +extern struct ioasid_set *vfio_mm_ioasid_set(struct vfio_mm *vmm);
>  extern int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max);
>  extern void vfio_pasid_free_range(struct vfio_mm *vmm,
>                                 ioasid_t min, ioasid_t max);
> @@ -114,6 +115,11 @@ static inline void vfio_mm_put(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct ioasid_set *vfio_mm_ioasid_set(struct vfio_mm *vmm)
> +{
> +     return -ENOTTY;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int vfio_pasid_alloc(struct vfio_mm *vmm, int min, int max)
>  {
>       return -ENOTTY;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index ff40f9e..a4bc42e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -1172,6 +1172,49 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get {
>  
>  #define VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES             _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17)
>  
> +/**
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18,
> + *                           struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request)
> + *
> + * PASID (Processor Address Space ID) is a PCIe concept for tagging
> + * address spaces in DMA requests. When system-wide PASID allocation
> + * is required by the underlying iommu driver (e.g. Intel VT-d), this
> + * provides an interface for userspace to request pasid alloc/free
> + * for its assigned devices. Userspace should check the availability
> + * of this API by checking VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_NESTING through
> + * VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO.
> + *
> + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID, allocate a single PASID within @range.
> + * @flags=VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID, free the PASIDs within @range.
> + * @range is [min, max], which means both @min and @max are inclusive.
> + * ALLOC_PASID and FREE_PASID are mutually exclusive.
> + *
> + * Current interface supports at most 31 bits PASID bits as returning
> + * PASID allocation result via signed int. PCIe spec defines 20 bits
> + * for PASID width, so 31 bits is enough. As a result user space should
> + * provide min, max no more than 31 bits.

Perhaps this is the description I was looking for, but this still
conflicts with what I think the user is supposed to do, which is to
provide a range within nesting_info.pasid_bits.  These seem like
implementation details, not uapi.  Thanks,

Alex

> + * returns: allocated PASID value on success, -errno on failure for
> + *       ALLOC_PASID;
> + *       0 for FREE_PASID operation;
> + */
> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request {
> +     __u32   argsz;
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID  (1 << 0)
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID   (1 << 1)
> +     __u32   flags;
> +     struct {
> +             __u32   min;
> +             __u32   max;
> +     } range;
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_PASID_REQUEST_MASK      (VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_ALLOC_PASID | \
> +                                      VFIO_IOMMU_FLAG_FREE_PASID)
> +
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_BITS                31
> +
> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_PASID_REQUEST     _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 18)
> +
>  /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>  
>  /*

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to