On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:51 AM Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:53:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > Alternatively, I'm considering trying to switch the module dependency > > annotation so that the CONFIG_QCOM_SCM modularity depends on ARM_SMMU > > being a module. But that is sort of putting the restriction on the > > callee instead of the caller (sort of flipping the meaning of the > > depends), which feels prone to later trouble (and with multiple users > > of CONFIG_QCOM_SCM needing similar treatment, it would make it > > difficult to discover the right combination of configs needed to allow > > it to be a module). > > > > Anyway, I wanted to reach out to see if you had any further ideas > > here. Sorry for letting such a large time gap pass! > > Well we can always go with your original hack, if it helps? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200714075603.GE4277@willie-the-truck/
Yea. After trying a few more ideas that didn't pan out, I think I'm going to fall back to that. :( thanks -john _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
