On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 01:43:51AM -0800, tangzhenhao wrote:
> At line 600 in drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c, the ret-val of kzalloc should be 
> checked to avoid null-ptr-deref bug.

There's no need to mention the line number of the file name in the commit
message -- that information is already available in the diff. Instead,
please try to describe the problem that you're solving.

Have a look at Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.

> Signed-off-by: tangzhenhao <tz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> index 3615cd6241c4..e3c576e5babb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@ static void insert_iommu_master(struct device *dev,
>  
>       if (list_empty(&(*iommu)->ctx_list)) {
>               master = kzalloc(sizeof(*master), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +             if (!master) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate IOMMU context bank 
> instance\n");

No need to print an error here -- kzalloc should be plenty noisy enough
if an atomic allocation fails.

> +                     return;

Hmm, and then what? We haven't propagated the error, so how much further do
we get?

Will
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to