On 2021/1/16 2:01, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:26:42 +0800
> Keqian Zhu <zhukeqi...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> If a group with non-pinned-page dirty scope is detached with dirty
>> logging enabled, we should fully populate the dirty bitmaps at the
>> time it's removed since we don't know the extent of its previous DMA,
>> nor will the group be present to trigger the full bitmap when the user
>> retrieves the dirty bitmap.
>>
>> Fixes: d6a4c185660c ("vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages
>> tracking")
>> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqi...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 0b4dedaa9128..4e82b9a3440f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -236,6 +236,19 @@ static void vfio_dma_populate_bitmap(struct vfio_dma
>> *dma, size_t pgsize)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> + struct rb_node *n;
>> + unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(iommu->pgsize_bitmap);
>> +
>> + for (n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
>> +
>> + if (dma->iommu_mapped)
>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, dma->size >> pgshift);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, size_t
>> pgsize)
>> {
>> struct rb_node *n;
>> @@ -2415,8 +2428,11 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void
>> *iommu_data,
>> * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow the iommu scope
>> * to be promoted.
>> */
>> - if (update_dirty_scope)
>> + if (update_dirty_scope) {
>> update_pinned_page_dirty_scope(iommu);
>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
>> + vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu);
>> + }
>> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> }
>>
>
> This doesn't do the right thing. This marks the bitmap dirty if:
>
> * The detached group dirty scope was not limited to pinned pages
>
> AND
>
> * Dirty tracking is enabled
>
> AND
>
> * The vfio_dma is *currently* (ie. after the detach) iommu_mapped
>
> We need to mark the bitmap dirty based on whether the vfio_dma *was*
> iommu_mapped by the group that is now detached. Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
Hi Alex,
Yes, I missed this point again :-(. The update_dirty_scope means we detached
an iommu backed group, and that means the vfio_dma *was* iommu_mapped by this
group, so we can populate full bitmap unconditionally, right?
Thanks,
Keqian
> .
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
