On 2021/1/20 23:54, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-01-20 14:14, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/1/20 21:27, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 2021-01-20 09:26, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2021/1/20 11:37, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2021/1/19 20:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>>>> On 2021-01-19 01:59, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>>>>>> Some SMMUv3 implementation embed the Perf Monitor Group Registers (PMCG)
>>>>>>> inside the first 64kB region of the SMMU. Since SMMU and PMCG are
>>>>>>> managed
>>>>>>> by two separate drivers, and this driver depends on ARM_SMMU_V3, so the
>>>>>>> SMMU driver reserves the corresponding resource first, this driver
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> not reserve the corresponding resource again. Otherwise, a resource
>>>>>>> reservation conflict is reported during boot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c | 42
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
>>>>>>> index 74474bb322c3f26..dcce085431c6ce8 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
>>>>>>> @@ -761,6 +761,44 @@ static void smmu_pmu_get_acpi_options(struct
>>>>>>> smmu_pmu *smmu_pmu)
>>>>>>> dev_notice(smmu_pmu->dev, "option mask 0x%x\n",
>>>>>>> smmu_pmu->options);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> +static void __iomem *
>>>>>>> +smmu_pmu_get_and_ioremap_resource(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>>>>> + unsigned int index,
>>>>>>> + struct resource **out_res)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>>>>>> + struct resource *res;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, index);
>>>>>>> + if (!res) {
>>>>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid resource\n");
>>>>>>> + return IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + if (out_res)
>>>>>>> + *out_res = res;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + ret = region_intersects(res->start, resource_size(res),
>>>>>>> + IORESOURCE_MEM, IORES_DESC_NONE);
>>>>>>> + if (ret == REGION_INTERSECTS) {
>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>> + * The resource has already been reserved by the SMMUv3 driver.
>>>>>>> + * Don't reserve it again, just do devm_ioremap().
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
>>>>>>> resource_size(res));
>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>> + * The resource may have not been reserved by any driver, or
>>>>>>> + * has been reserved but not type IORESOURCE_MEM. In the latter
>>>>>>> + * case, devm_ioremap_resource() reports a conflict and returns
>>>>>>> + * IOMEM_ERR_PTR(-EBUSY).
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What if the PMCG driver simply happens to probe first?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are 4 cases:
>>>>> 1) ARM_SMMU_V3=m, ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU=y
>>>>> It's not allowed. Becase: ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU depends on ARM_SMMU_V3
>>>>> config ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU
>>>>> tristate "ARM SMMUv3 Performance Monitors Extension"
>>>>> depends on ARM64 && ACPI && ARM_SMMU_V3
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) ARM_SMMU_V3=y, ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU=m
>>>>> No problem, SMMUv3 will be initialized first.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) ARM_SMMU_V3=y, ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU=y
>>>>> vi drivers/Makefile
>>>>> 60 obj-y += iommu/
>>>>> 172 obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += perf/
>>>>>
>>>>> This link sequence ensure that SMMUv3 driver will be initialized
>>>>> first.
>>>>> They are currently at the same initialization level.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) ARM_SMMU_V3=m, ARM_SMMU_V3_PMU=m
>>>>> Sorry, I thought module dependencies were generated based on
>>>>> "depends on".
>>>>> But I tried it today，module dependencies are generated only when
>>>>> symbol
>>>>> dependencies exist. I should use MODULE_SOFTDEP() to explicitly mark
>>>>> the
>>>>> dependency. I will send V2 later.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Robin:
>>>> I think I misunderstood your question. The probe() instead of
>>>> module_init()
>>>> determines the time for reserving register space resources. So we'd better
>>>> reserve multiple small blocks of resources in SMMUv3 but perform ioremap()
>>>> for
>>>> the entire resource, if the probe() of the PMCG occurs first.
>>>> I'll refine these patches to make both initialization sequences work
>>>> well.
>>>> I'm trying to send V2 this week.
>>>
>>> There's still the possibility that a PMCG is implemented in a root complex
>>> or some other device that isn't an SMMU, so as I've said before, none of
>>> this trickery really scales.
>>>
>>> As far as I understand it, the main point of reserving resources is to
>>> catch bugs where things definitely should not be overlapping. PMCGs are by
>>> definition part of some other device, so in general they *can* be expected
>>> to overlap with whatever device that is. I still think it's most logical to
>>> simply *not* try to reserve PMCG resources at all.
>>
>> If PMCG resources may overlap with other devices, that's really going to be
>> a very tricky thing. OK, I'll follow your advice，just do ioremap() for the
>> PMCG resources.
>>
>> I know that I/O resource information can be queried by running "cat
>> /proc/iomem". If we do not reserve PMCG resources, should we provide an
>> additional fs query interface?
>
> What would that be necessary for? The PMU devices are already named by base
> address so they can be identified. Sysfs tells you whether the driver bound
> to any platform devices or not (although in this case the existence of PMU
> devices already makes that clear). /proc/iomem is for showing claimed
> resources, and many drivers don't claim resources. I've never heard any
> inkling of that being a practical problem :/
>
OK, so keep the code of the PMCG driver unchanged. Currently, PMCG resources
may not overlap with other devices except SMMUv3.
I sometimes use "cat /proc/ioomem" to look up the base address, then use devmem
command to query the register content.
> Robin.
>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + return base;
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> static int smmu_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> struct smmu_pmu *smmu_pmu;
>>>>>>> @@ -793,7 +831,7 @@ static int smmu_pmu_probe(struct platform_device
>>>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>>> .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> - smmu_pmu->reg_base =
>>>>>>> devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res_0);
>>>>>>> + smmu_pmu->reg_base = smmu_pmu_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0,
>>>>>>> &res_0);
>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(smmu_pmu->reg_base))
>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR(smmu_pmu->reg_base);
>>>>>>> @@ -801,7 +839,7 @@ static int smmu_pmu_probe(struct
>>>>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>> /* Determine if page 1 is present */
>>>>>>> if (cfgr & SMMU_PMCG_CFGR_RELOC_CTRS) {
>>>>>>> - smmu_pmu->reloc_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1);
>>>>>>> + smmu_pmu->reloc_base = smmu_pmu_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev,
>>>>>>> 1, NULL);
>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(smmu_pmu->reloc_base))
>>>>>>> return PTR_ERR(smmu_pmu->reloc_base);
>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
> .
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
