Hi Keqian,
On 2/2/21 1:34 PM, Keqian Zhu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 2020/11/16 19:00, Eric Auger wrote:
>> From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l....@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> This patch adds an VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE ioctl
>> which aims to pass the virtual iommu guest configuration
>> to the host. This latter takes the form of the so-called
>> PASID table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v11 -> v12:
>> - use iommu_uapi_set_pasid_table
>> - check SET and UNSET are not set simultaneously (Zenghui)
>>
>> v8 -> v9:
>> - Merge VFIO_IOMMU_ATTACH/DETACH_PASID_TABLE into a single
>> VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE ioctl.
>>
>> v6 -> v7:
>> - add a comment related to VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE
>>
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - restore ATTACH/DETACH
>> - add unwind on failure
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - s/BIND_PASID_TABLE/SET_PASID_TABLE
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - s/BIND_GUEST_STAGE/BIND_PASID_TABLE
>> - remove the struct device arg
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 19 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 67e827638995..87ddd9e882dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -2587,6 +2587,41 @@ static int vfio_iommu_iova_build_caps(struct
>> vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static void
>> +vfio_detach_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_domain *d;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next)
>> + iommu_detach_pasid_table(d->domain);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +vfio_attach_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_domain *d;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
>> + ret = iommu_uapi_attach_pasid_table(d->domain, (void __user
>> *)arg);
> This design is not very clear to me. This assumes all iommu_domains share the
> same pasid table.
>
> As I understand, it's reasonable when there is only one group in the domain,
> and only one domain in the vfio_iommu.
> If more than one group in the vfio_iommu, the guest may put them into
> different guest iommu_domain, then they have different pasid table.
>
> Is this the use scenario?
the vfio_iommu is attached to a container. all the groups within a
container share the same set of page tables (linux
Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst). So to me if you want to use
different pasid tables, the groups need to be attached to different
containers. Does that make sense to you?
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks,
> Keqian
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unwind;
>> + }
>> + goto unlock;
>> +unwind:
>> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
>> + iommu_detach_pasid_table(d->domain);
>> + }
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vfio_iommu_migration_build_caps(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
>> {
>> @@ -2747,6 +2782,34 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unmap_dma(struct
>> vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> -EFAULT : 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> + unsigned long arg)
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table spt;
>> + unsigned long minsz;
>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table, flags);
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&spt, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + if (spt.argsz < minsz)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (spt.flags & VFIO_PASID_TABLE_FLAG_SET &&
>> + spt.flags & VFIO_PASID_TABLE_FLAG_UNSET)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (spt.flags & VFIO_PASID_TABLE_FLAG_SET)
>> + ret = vfio_attach_pasid_table(iommu, arg + minsz);
>> + else if (spt.flags & VFIO_PASID_TABLE_FLAG_UNSET) {
>> + vfio_detach_pasid_table(iommu);
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> @@ -2867,6 +2930,8 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>> return vfio_iommu_type1_unmap_dma(iommu, arg);
>> case VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES:
>> return vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_pages(iommu, arg);
>> + case VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE:
>> + return vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table(iommu, arg);
>> default:
>> return -ENOTTY;
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> index 2f313a238a8f..78ce3ce6c331 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> #include <linux/ioctl.h>
>> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>>
>> #define VFIO_API_VERSION 0
>>
>> @@ -1180,6 +1181,24 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get {
>>
>> #define VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17)
>>
>> +/*
>> + * VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 22,
>> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table)
>> + *
>> + * The SET operation passes a PASID table to the host while the
>> + * UNSET operation detaches the one currently programmed. Setting
>> + * a table while another is already programmed replaces the old table.
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_pasid_table {
>> + __u32 argsz;
>> + __u32 flags;
>> +#define VFIO_PASID_TABLE_FLAG_SET (1 << 0)
>> +#define VFIO_PASID_TABLE_FLAG_UNSET (1 << 1)
>> + struct iommu_pasid_table_config config; /* used on SET */
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 22)
>> +
>> /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>>
>> /*
>>
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
