On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:33:12 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:52:03 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <j...@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:54:51AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > That's essentially replacing vfio-core, where I think we're more
> >
> > I am only talking about /dev/vfio here which is basically the IOMMU
> > interface part.
> >
> > I still expect that VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER will be used to connect
> > /dev/{ioasid,vfio} to the VFIO group and all the group and device
> > logic stays inside VFIO.
>
> But that group and device logic is also tied to the container, where
> the IOMMU backend is the interchangeable thing that provides the IOMMU
> manipulation for that container. If you're using
> VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER to associate a group to a /dev/ioasid, then
> you're really either taking that group outside of vfio or you're
> re-implementing group management in /dev/ioasid. I'd expect the
> transition point at VFIO_SET_IOMMU.
per my understanding, transiting at the VFIO_SET_IOMMU point makes more
sense as VFIO can still have the group and device logic, which is the key
concept of group granularity isolation for userspace direct access.
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
