On 2021-07-06 17:21, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:27 PM Robin Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2021-07-06 07:51, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
Commit 28b41e2c6aeb ("iommu: Move def_domain type check for untrusted
device into core") not only moved the check for untrusted device to
IOMMU core, it also introduced a behavioral change by returning
def_domain_type() directly without checking its return value. That makes
many devices no longer use the default IOMMU setting.

So revert back to the old behavior which defaults to
iommu_def_domain_type when driver callback returns 0.

Fixes: 28b41e2c6aeb ("iommu: Move def_domain type check for untrusted device into 
core")

Are you sure about that? From that same commit:

@@ -1507,7 +1509,7 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct
iommu_group *group,
          if (group->default_domain)
                  return 0;

-       type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(dev);
+       type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(dev) ? : iommu_def_domain_type;

          return iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
   }

AFAICS the other two callers should also handle 0 correctly. Have you
seen a problem in practice?

Thanks for pointing out how the return value is being handled by the callers.
However, the same check is missing in probe_get_default_domain_type():
static int probe_get_default_domain_type(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
         struct __group_domain_type *gtype = data;
         unsigned int type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(dev);
...
}

I'm still not following - the next line right after that is "if (type)", which means it won't touch gtype, and if that happens for every iteration, probe_alloc_default_domain() subsequently hits its "if (!gtype.type)" condition and still ends up with iommu_def_domain_type. This *was* one of the other two callers I was talking about (the second being iommu_change_dev_def_domain()), and in fact on second look I think your proposed change will actually break this logic, since it's necessary to differentiate between a specific type being requested for the given device, and a "don't care" response which only implies to use the global default type if it's still standing after *all* the appropriate devices have been queried.

I personally prefer the old way instead of open coding with ternary
operator, so I'll do that in v2.

In practice, this causes a kernel panic when probing Realtek WiFi.
Because of the bug, dma_ops isn't set by probe_finalize(),
dma_map_single() falls back to swiotlb which isn't set and caused a
kernel panic.

Hmm, but if that's the case, wouldn't it still be a problem anyway if the end result was IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY? I can't claim to fully understand the x86 swiotlb and no_iommu dance, but nothing really stands out to give me confidence that it handles the passthrough options correctly.

Robin.

I didn't attach the panic log because the system simply is frozen at
that point so the message is not logged to the storage.
I'll see if I can find another way to collect the log and attach it in v2.

Kai-Heng


Robin.

Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <[email protected]>
---
   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 5 +++--
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 5419c4b9f27a..faac4f795025 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1507,14 +1507,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsl_mc_device_group);
   static int iommu_get_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
   {
       const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev->bus->iommu_ops;
+     unsigned int type = 0;

       if (dev_is_pci(dev) && to_pci_dev(dev)->untrusted)
               return IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;

       if (ops->def_domain_type)
-             return ops->def_domain_type(dev);
+             type = ops->def_domain_type(dev);

-     return 0;
+     return (type == 0) ? iommu_def_domain_type : type;
   }

   static int iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(struct bus_type *bus,

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to