> This is a follow-up on 5f89468e2f06 ("swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when
> tlb_addr has offset") which fixed unaligned dma mappings, making sure the
> following overflows are caught:
> 
> - offset of the start of the slot within the device bigger than requested
> address' offset, in other words if the base address given in
> swiotlb_tbl_map_single to create the mapping (orig_addr) was after the
> requested address for the sync (tlb_offset) in the same block:
> 
>  |------------------------------------------| block
>               <----------------------------> mapped part of the block
>               ^
>               orig_addr
>        ^
>        invalid tlb_addr for sync
> 
> - if the resulting offset was bigger than the allocation size this one
> could happen if the mapping was not until the end. e.g.
> 
>  |------------------------------------------| block
>       <---------------------> mapped part of the block
>       ^                               ^
>       orig_addr                       invalid tlb_addr
> 
> Both should never happen so print a warning and bail out without trying to
> adjust the sizes/offsets: the first one could try to sync from orig_addr
> to whatever is left of the requested size, but the later really has
> nothing to sync there...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bumyong Lee <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Bumyong Lee <[email protected]

> Cc: Chanho Park <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> here's the follow up for the swiotlb/caamjr regression I had promissed.
> It doesn't really change anything, and I confirmed I don't hit either of
> the warnings on our board, but it's probably best to have as either could
> really happen.
> 
> 
>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index
> e50df8d8f87e..23f8d0b168c5 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -354,13 +354,27 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev,
> phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size
>       size_t alloc_size = mem->slots[index].alloc_size;
>       unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(orig_addr);
>       unsigned char *vaddr = phys_to_virt(tlb_addr);
> -     unsigned int tlb_offset;
> +     unsigned int tlb_offset, orig_addr_offset;
> 
>       if (orig_addr == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR)
>               return;
> 
> -     tlb_offset = (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)) -
> -                  swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
> +     tlb_offset = tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
> +     orig_addr_offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
> +     if (tlb_offset < orig_addr_offset) {
> +             dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1,
> +                     "Access before mapping start detected. orig offset
%u,
> requested offset %u.\n",
> +                     orig_addr_offset, tlb_offset);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     tlb_offset -= orig_addr_offset;
> +     if (tlb_offset > alloc_size) {
> +             dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1,
> +                     "Buffer overflow detected. Allocation size: %zu.
> Mapping size: %zu+%u.\n",
> +                     alloc_size, size, tlb_offset);
> +             return;
> +     }
> 
>       orig_addr += tlb_offset;
>       alloc_size -= tlb_offset;
> --
> 2.30.2


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to