On 2021-07-22 17:44, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi Robin,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on iommu/next]
[also build test ERROR on rockchip/for-next linus/master v5.14-rc2 
next-20210722]
[cannot apply to sunxi/sunxi/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Robin-Murphy/iommu-Refactor-DMA-domain-strictness/20210722-022514
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git next
config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
         wget 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O 
~/bin/make.cross
         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
         # 
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/c05e0e1856b394eff1167c00f7bbd6ac7cc9dea6
         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
         git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
Robin-Murphy/iommu-Refactor-DMA-domain-strictness/20210722-022514
         git checkout c05e0e1856b394eff1167c00f7bbd6ac7cc9dea6
         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
         mkdir build_dir
         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross 
O=build_dir ARCH=ia64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

    In file included from arch/ia64/include/asm/bug.h:17,
                     from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                     from include/linux/thread_info.h:13,
                     from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5,
                     from ./arch/ia64/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1,
                     from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
                     from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
                     from include/linux/wait.h:9,
                     from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
                     from include/linux/fs.h:6,
                     from include/linux/debugfs.h:15,
                     from drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:18:
    drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c: In function 'domain_get_iommu':
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:604:38: error: '__IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA' undeclared 
(first use in this function); did you mean 'IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA'?
      604 |  if (WARN_ON(!(domain->domain.type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)))
          |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    include/asm-generic/bug.h:121:25: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON'
      121 |  int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);    \
          |                         ^~~~~~~~~
    drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c:604:38: note: each undeclared identifier is 
reported only once for each function it appears in
      604 |  if (WARN_ON(!(domain->domain.type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)))
          |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    include/asm-generic/bug.h:121:25: note: in definition of macro 'WARN_ON'
      121 |  int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);    \
          |                         ^~~~~~~~~


vim +604 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c

    597 
    598 /* This functionin only returns single iommu in a domain */
    599 struct intel_iommu *domain_get_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain)
    600 {
    601         int iommu_id;
    602 
    603         /* si_domain and vm domain should not get here. */
  > 604              if (WARN_ON(!(domain->domain.type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA)))

Bleh, of course that should be __IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_API like the other two instances. I'll fix this locally ready for v2.

Thanks,
Robin.

    605                 return NULL;
    606 
    607         for_each_domain_iommu(iommu_id, domain)
    608                 break;
    609 
    610         if (iommu_id < 0 || iommu_id >= g_num_of_iommus)
    611                 return NULL;
    612 
    613         return g_iommus[iommu_id];
    614 }
    615 

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to