On 7/30/21 5:34 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> @@ -451,7 +450,7 @@ void __init mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void)
>> * The unused memory range was mapped decrypted, change the encryption
>> * attribute from decrypted to encrypted before freeing it.
>> */
>> - if (mem_encrypt_active()) {
>> + if (sme_me_mask) {
>
> Any reason this uses sme_me_mask? The helper it calls,
> __set_memory_enc_dec(),
> uses prot_guest_has(PATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT) so I assume it's available?
Probably just a slip on my part. I was debating at one point calling the
helper vs. referencing the variables/functions directly in the
mem_encrypt.c file.
Thanks,
Tom
>
>> r = set_memory_encrypted(vaddr, npages);
>> if (r) {
>> pr_warn("failed to free unused decrypted pages\n");
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
