On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:21:46PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Once the page faults are handled, the response has to be sent to
> virtio-iommu backend, from where it can be sent to the host to
> prepare the response to a generated io page fault by the device.
> Add a new virt-queue request type to handle this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h 
> b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> index c12d9b6a7243..1b174b98663a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_config {
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_T_PROBE                 0x05
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_T_ATTACH_TABLE          0x06
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_T_INVALIDATE            0x07
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_T_PAGE_RESP             0x08
>  
>  /* Status types */
>  #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_S_OK                    0x00
> @@ -70,6 +71,23 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_tail {
>       __u8                                    reserved[3];
>  };
>  
> +struct virtio_iommu_req_page_resp {
> +     struct virtio_iommu_req_head            head;
> +     __le32                                  domain;

I don't think we need this field, since the fault report doesn't come with
a domain.

> +     __le32                                  endpoint;
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_PASID_VALID   (1 << 0)

To be consistent with the rest of the document this would be
VIRTIO_IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_F_PASID_VALID

> +     __le32                                  flags;
> +     __le32                                  pasid;
> +     __le32                                  grpid;
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS               (0x0)
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID               (0x1)
> +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_FAILURE               (0x2)
> +     __le16                                  resp_code;
> +     __u8                                    pasid_valid;

This field isn't needed since there already is
VIRTIO_IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_PASID_VALID

> +     __u8                                    reserved[9];
> +     struct virtio_iommu_req_tail            tail;
> +};

I'd align the size of the struct to 16 bytes, but I don't think that's
strictly necessary.

Thanks,
Jean

> +
>  struct virtio_iommu_req_attach {
>       struct virtio_iommu_req_head            head;
>       __le32                                  domain;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to