On 30.09.21 05:28, Yong Wu wrote:
Hi Dafna,

Thanks very much for the review.

On Wed, 2021-09-29 at 14:13 +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:

On 29.09.21 03:37, Yong Wu wrote:
MediaTek IOMMU has already added the device_link between the
consumer
and smi-larb device. If the vcodec device call the
pm_runtime_get_sync,
the smi-larb's pm_runtime_get_sync also be called automatically.

CC: Tiffany Lin <tiffany....@mediatek.com>
CC: Irui Wang <irui.w...@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgr...@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany....@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschf...@collabora.com>
---
   .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c   | 37 +++-----------
--
   .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h      |  3 --
   .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc.c      |  1 -
   .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c   | 44 +++-----------
-----
   4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
index 6038db96f71c..d0bf9aa3b29d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
@@ -8,14 +8,12 @@
   #include <linux/of_address.h>
   #include <linux/of_platform.h>
   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
-#include <soc/mediatek/smi.h>
#include "mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.h"
   #include "mtk_vcodec_util.h"
int mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *mtkdev)
   {
-       struct device_node *node;
        struct platform_device *pdev;
        struct mtk_vcodec_pm *pm;
        struct mtk_vcodec_clk *dec_clk;
@@ -26,18 +24,7 @@ int mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev
*mtkdev)
        pm = &mtkdev->pm;
        pm->mtkdev = mtkdev;
        dec_clk = &pm->vdec_clk;
-       node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,larb", 0);
-       if (!node) {
-               mtk_v4l2_err("of_parse_phandle mediatek,larb fail!");
-               return -1;
-       }
- pdev = of_find_device_by_node(node);
-       of_node_put(node);
-       if (WARN_ON(!pdev)) {
-               return -1;
-       }
-       pm->larbvdec = &pdev->dev;
        pdev = mtkdev->plat_dev;
        pm->dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -47,14 +34,11 @@ int mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm(struct
mtk_vcodec_dev *mtkdev)
                dec_clk->clk_info = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
                        dec_clk->clk_num, sizeof(*clk_info),
                        GFP_KERNEL);
-               if (!dec_clk->clk_info) {
-                       ret = -ENOMEM;
-                       goto put_device;
-               }
+               if (!dec_clk->clk_info)
+                       return -ENOMEM;
        } else {
                mtk_v4l2_err("Failed to get vdec clock count");
-               ret = -EINVAL;
-               goto put_device;
+               return -EINVAL;
        }
for (i = 0; i < dec_clk->clk_num; i++) {
@@ -63,29 +47,24 @@ int mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm(struct
mtk_vcodec_dev *mtkdev)
                        "clock-names", i, &clk_info->clk_name);
                if (ret) {
                        mtk_v4l2_err("Failed to get clock name id =
%d", i);
-                       goto put_device;
+                       return ret;
                }
                clk_info->vcodec_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev,
                        clk_info->clk_name);
                if (IS_ERR(clk_info->vcodec_clk)) {
                        mtk_v4l2_err("devm_clk_get (%d)%s fail", i,
                                clk_info->clk_name);
-                       ret = PTR_ERR(clk_info->vcodec_clk);
-                       goto put_device;
+                       return PTR_ERR(clk_info->vcodec_clk);
                }
        }
pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
        return 0;
-put_device:
-       put_device(pm->larbvdec);
-       return ret;
   }
void mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev)
   {
        pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
-       put_device(dev->pm.larbvdec);
   }

Now that functions only do  'pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);' so it
will be more
readable to remove the function mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
and replace with pm_runtime_disable(dev->pm.dev);
Same for the 'enc' equivalent.

Make sense. But It may be not proper if using pm_runtime_disable
as the symmetry with mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm in the mtk_vcodec_probe.

Maybe we should move pm_runtime_enable out from mtk_vcodec_init_dec_pm
into mtk_vcodec_probe. I could do a new patch for this. Is this ok for
you?

yes, there is also asymettry when calling pm_runtime* in general,
I see in the decoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c
but in the encoder it is called from mtk_vcodec_enc.c,

I think all calls to pm_runtime* should be out of the *_pm.c files
since for example 'mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on' also do just one call to
pm_runtime_resume_and_get so this function can also be removed.

thanks,
Dafna



Thanks,
Dafna

[snip]
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
linux-media...@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to