On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:05:44AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> pci_stub allows the admin to block driver binding on a device and make
> it permanently shared with userspace. Since pci_stub does not do DMA,
> it is safe. 

Can you elaborate on what "permanently shared with userspace" means
here?  I assume it's only permanent as long as pci-stub is bound to
the device?

Also, a few words about what "it is safe" means here would be helpful.

> However the admin must understand that using pci_stub allows
> userspace to attack whatever device it was bound to.

The admin isn't going to read this sentence.  Should there be a doc
update related to this?  What sort of attack does this refer to?

> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-stub.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-stub.c b/drivers/pci/pci-stub.c
> index e408099fea52..6324c68602b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-stub.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ static struct pci_driver stub_driver = {
>       .name           = "pci-stub",
>       .id_table       = NULL, /* only dynamic id's */
>       .probe          = pci_stub_probe,
> +     .driver         = {
> +             .suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner = true,
> +     },
>  };
>  
>  static int __init pci_stub_init(void)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to