On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:49:25 +0800
Yicong Yang <yangyic...@hisilicon.com> wrote:

> Register PMU device of PTT trace, then users can use trace through perf
> command. The driver makes use of perf AUX trace and support following
> events to configure the trace:
> 
> - filter: select Root port or Endpoint to trace
> - type: select the type of traced TLP headers
> - direction: select the direction of traced TLP headers
> - format: select the data format of the traced TLP headers
> 
> This patch adds the PMU driver part of PTT trace. The perf command support
> of PTT trace is added in the following patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyic...@hisilicon.com>

It seems to me that you ended up doing both suggestions for
how to clean up the remove order when it was meant to be
a question of picking one or the other.

Otherwise this looks good to me - so with that tidied up

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>

> ---

> +
> +static int hisi_ptt_register_pmu(struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt)
> +{
> +     u16 core_id, sicl_id;
> +     char *pmu_name;
> +     u32 reg;
> +
> +     hisi_ptt->hisi_ptt_pmu = (struct pmu) {
> +             .module         = THIS_MODULE,
> +             .capabilities   = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE | PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE,
> +             .task_ctx_nr    = perf_sw_context,
> +             .attr_groups    = hisi_ptt_pmu_groups,
> +             .event_init     = hisi_ptt_pmu_event_init,
> +             .setup_aux      = hisi_ptt_pmu_setup_aux,
> +             .free_aux       = hisi_ptt_pmu_free_aux,
> +             .start          = hisi_ptt_pmu_start,
> +             .stop           = hisi_ptt_pmu_stop,
> +             .add            = hisi_ptt_pmu_add,
> +             .del            = hisi_ptt_pmu_del,
> +     };
> +
> +     reg = readl(hisi_ptt->iobase + HISI_PTT_LOCATION);
> +     core_id = FIELD_GET(HISI_PTT_CORE_ID, reg);
> +     sicl_id = FIELD_GET(HISI_PTT_SICL_ID, reg);
> +
> +     pmu_name = devm_kasprintf(&hisi_ptt->pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, 
> "hisi_ptt%u_%u",
> +                               sicl_id, core_id);
> +     if (!pmu_name)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     return perf_pmu_register(&hisi_ptt->hisi_ptt_pmu, pmu_name, -1);

As below, you can put back the devm cleanup that you had in v4 now you
have modified how the filter cleanup is done to also be devm managed.

> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * The DMA of PTT trace can only use direct mapping, due to some
>   * hardware restriction. Check whether there is an IOMMU or the
> @@ -303,15 +825,32 @@ static int hisi_ptt_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  
>       pci_set_master(pdev);
>  
> +     ret = hisi_ptt_register_irq(hisi_ptt);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
>       ret = hisi_ptt_init_ctrls(hisi_ptt);
>       if (ret) {
>               pci_err(pdev, "failed to init controls, ret = %d.\n", ret);
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
> +     ret = hisi_ptt_register_pmu(hisi_ptt);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             pci_err(pdev, "failed to register pmu device, ret = %d", ret);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +void hisi_ptt_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct hisi_ptt *hisi_ptt = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +     perf_pmu_unregister(&hisi_ptt->hisi_ptt_pmu);

Now you have the filter cleanup occurring using a devm_add_action_or_reset()
there is no need to have a manual cleanup of this - you can
use the approach of a devm_add_action_or_reset like you had in v4.

As it is the last call in the probe() order it will be the first one
called in the device managed cleanup.

> +}
> +


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to