Hi Kevin, On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:54:19 +0000, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.t...@intel.com> wrote:
> > From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 1:07 PM > > > > With the availability of a generic device-PASID-domain attachment API, > > there's no need to special case RID2PASID. Use the API to replace > > duplicated code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 18 ++---------------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > > index 9267194eaed3..f832b7599d21 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > > @@ -1683,9 +1683,6 @@ static void domain_flush_piotlb(struct > > intel_iommu *iommu, > > qi_flush_piotlb(iommu, did, domain->default_pasid, > > addr, npages, ih); > > > > - if (!list_empty(&domain->devices)) > > - qi_flush_piotlb(iommu, did, PASID_RID2PASID, addr, > > npages, ih); > > - > > this should be rebased on top of Baolu's "iommu cleanup and refactoring" > series which has removed the entire domain_flush_piotlb(). > Yes, I have been working with Baolu. Some of the refactoring patches were withdrawn, so there are lots of moving targets. Thanks, Jacob _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
