On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 01:21:20PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> static void iopf_handle_group(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct iopf_group *group;
> @@ -134,12 +78,23 @@ static void iopf_handle_group(struct work_struct *work)
> group = container_of(work, struct iopf_group, work);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(iopf, next, &group->faults, list) {
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid_async(group->dev,
> + iopf->fault.prm.pasid);
Reading the PCIe spec again (v6.0 10.4.1.1 PASID Usage), all faults within
the group have the same PASID so we could move the domain fetch out of the
loop. It does deviate from the old behavior, though, so we could change
it later.
Thanks,
Jean
> + if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler)
> + status = IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID;
> +
> /*
> * For the moment, errors are sticky: don't handle subsequent
> * faults in the group if there is an error.
> */
> if (status == IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_SUCCESS)
> - status = iopf_handle_single(iopf);
> + status = domain->iopf_handler(&iopf->fault,
> + domain->fault_data);
> +
> + if (domain)
> + iommu_domain_put_async(domain);
>
> if (!(iopf->fault.prm.flags &
> IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_LAST_PAGE))
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
