On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:28:49AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > Well, as before I'd prefer to make the code match the commit message - > > if I really need to spell it out, see below - since I can't imagine that > > we should ever have need to identify a set of iommu_domain_ops in > > isolation, therefore I think it's considerably clearer to use the > > iommu_domain itself. However, either way we really don't need this yet, > > so we may as well just go ahead and remove the redundant test from VFIO > > anyway, and I can add some form of this patch to my dev branch for now. > > I see. The version below is much cleaner. Yet, it'd become having a > common pointer per iommu_domain vs. one pointer per driver. Jason > pointed it out to me earlier that by doing so memory waste would be > unnecessary on platforms that have considerable numbers of masters.
I had ment using struct iommu_domain when there is a simple solution to use rodata doesn't seem ideal. I don't quite understand the reluctance to make small changes to drivers, it was the same logic with the default_domain_ops thing too. > Since we know that it'd be safe to exclude this single change from > this series, I can drop it in next version, if you don't like the > change. But this is fine too, that really is half the point of this series.. Jason _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
