On 2007-03-20, Joerg van den Hoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would you tolerate, for once, "bug-reports" ("page 4, paragraph 5 should
> read...") instead of using `darcs' (maybe I have time to look through the
> reference, but no time for understanding the workings of `darcs' first...)?Of course I'd prefer patches, but I didn't ask for them: I asked for bug reports. If such page numbering is used, one should remember to ues the released version then (and preferrably the dvi/ps/pdf/whatever on the Web page or the tarball, to make sure that the numbering is the same). -- Tuomo
