On 2007-04-25, Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this change likely to be acceptable, Tuomo?
Umm... any kind of OO shit in C absolutely positively depends on function pointer casts. Or are you going to wrap all the _hundreds_ of pseudo-dynamic functions? Over my dead body. More uglier is the case of function pointers to data pointers used somewhere in the code. I haven't checked if there's a way around it, but then again, any sane architechture will have matching function and data pointers. (Functions should be nothing special! They should be data like everything else! Stuff of the first class!) -- Tuomo
