> Yep, you can do incredible things in 10 lines. But to think how to write > those few lines takes ten times as long as the writing the corresponding > 1000 lines of C.
> That approach doesn't scale to big projects > Haskell just sucks for the moderately object-oriented approach that is > "obvious" for certain things. > You have to build workarounds upon workarounds, because the obvious > approach can't be sanely done.[*] [...and so on...] Ever tried Common Lisp? Leslie
