On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:49:41PM +0300, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:31:01PM -0300, Christian Reis wrote: > > AFAICT closing the transient should focus the transient's parent, or you > > end up getting tricked into pressing Alt-C multiple times to close a > > sequence of dialogs and closing something else by mistake. > > FloatWS:s have no notion of transients after setting up the stacking and > I have no plans of writing such kludges. The concept of a separate floating > transient does not fit the tabbed frame model.
Well, the issue remains that transients are mishandled in FloatWS:s -- should we expect them never to be handled properly, or is it a matter of getting it done the right way? Maybe have them handled as they are in regular IonWS:s? Having FloatWS was a great way to step away from Xnest into a general WM solution that covers most use cases a developer requires. I can't see why the extra mile should stop us from getting all the way :-) Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL
