On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:01:50AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > I don't know. I'm on a 9600bps GSM line and I don't have the C standard > here. The va_list is probably some weird data type on those archs which > cannot be assigned, only va_copy'd. But I can't file it as a compiler bug > unless I know it violates the standard. You're very welcome to reply to > the bug and/or file a compiler bug yourself if you think it is.
All I know is that va_copy is a C99 feature and is hardly anywhere available. The obvious patch is to store a pointer to the original va_list in ExtlDoCallParam instead of assigning a copy there. -- Tuomo
