On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 13:08 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > X(1) should be documentation of the X program in a user's PATH. X(7) > should be miscellaneous info about the X windoiw system.
I see. But doesn't it make more sense for ion(1) to refer to the general description of the X Window System? Hmm, maybe not. > Since Debian does have an X program, I think it's a bit of a bug > that we do not include an X(1). Indeed. I filed a bug (#230664) against xserver-common. > (It could be a link to XFree86(1) probably.) No, X is included in the xserver-common package which does not include that XFree86. It should probably be linked to Xserver(1x) instead, which appears to describe the X program.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
