One other option would be using berlios.de but choosing some body else to setup/handle the wiki software.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:11:34 +0200, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:52:54PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > > >On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 05:50:19PM +0100, Felix Wiemann wrote: > > > > > >>I don't have any experience with wiki spam, but it might be worth giving > > >>a try, provided that you have enough time to fiddle with the wiki > > >>source. > > > > > >I have the time (for now), but not the motivation. If the wiki should > > >remain (I'm not entirely convinced of that), I'm pretty convinced of > > >giving MoinMoin a chance. But this requires a server to run it on. > > >Either someone could donate the space, or I could move this ML and the > > As I told, I'm willing to donate space und moinmoin :). > > Mailman would be also available. > > Since I'm also trying to find a relatively "stable" "resting place" for Ion > after I stop actively working on it, I kind of prefer moving stuff to one of > these sf clones where a new developer, if one arises, can be more easily > given write access to the project stuff. The ML now as we must give up this > list, home page, script repositories and svn later when it seems convenient > (and svn becomes available). Something must be done about this wiki spam > problem too, though. The wiki isn't such an essential componen so maybe it > is ok for it to be on more "unstable" space too... Thus the alternatives at > the moment are 1) ML moved to gna.org and you donate the wiki space, 2) ML > and wiki moved to berlios.de (but then I'd need to maintain the wiki > software.. bleah). Maybe 1) would be the way to go. Does anyone have > any opinions on this? > > -- > Tuomo >
