> > Is the thinking that this is GPL2-compatible because the license says "GPL2 > or later"?
Torvalds had one of his famous hissy fits over that clause and gave a well reasoned argument that the clause was not really necessary for a project to move to gpl3. Whether that view is from him talking to Red Hat's legal team or just his opinion, isn't clear. I just don't see Zenimax having a problem with using their newer code within their older code as long as the new license is followed. _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
