Dear All,

Ahead of next week’s meeting, you’ll find 
here<https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13382-Cybersecurity-security-requirements-for-ICT-product-certification/F3437592_en>
 and below the comments provided on behalf of the SOGIS Management Committee.

The publication of the draft EUCC implementing regulation was welcomed by the 
participants of the SOG-IS Management Committee of the 6th of October, who 
strongly support fast adoption of the EUCC as first European cybersecurity 
certification scheme. Based on the long experience gathered from many years of 
collaboration among national cybersecurity certification schemes, SOG-IS 
participants would like to take the opportunity of this public consultation to 
contribute to the final phase of adoption of the scheme with a specific focus 
on the transition of national schemes to EUCC and the management organisation 
for the future maintenance of the scheme. Member States will provide further 
contributions through comitology. Given the different usage of Common Criteria 
certificates in EU Member States, SOG-IS participants consider necessary to 
revise the scope of EUCC as outlined in article 1 to identify the certificates 
which actually fall into the scope of the EUCC implementing regulation. 
Pursuant to article 50 of the draft EUCC implementing regulation, all national 
schemes falling into the scope of EUCC will cease to produce effect. The 
implications of such provision, i.e. cease to produce effect, are not 
completely clear from a legal point of view. The certificates already issued by 
existing national scheme will continue to be valid till their expiry date. 
However, life-cycle management of such certificates, also following the 
application of EUCC (12 month after entry into force) shall continue to be 
guaranteed till their expiry date. For example, maintenance of certificate 
shall be allowed and include the possibility of revoke certificates before 
their expiry date. Regarding the mandatory component ALC_FLR (Art. 7, lett. b)) 
and vulnerability monitoring (artt. 8, 26, 27, 32, 34, 36) it is worth 
highlighting that ALC_FLR, as of today, does not provide evaluation of the 
effectiveness/actual application of flaw remediation procedures requested by 
EUCC. A solution in the EUCC implementing regulation shall be further 
investigated to best enforce vulnerability reporting and monitoring also 
considering the need to ease the transition of existing certificates to EUCC. A 
maintenance infrastructure for EUCC should be ensured prior to the entry into 
force of EUCC. It should include the creation of an ECCG subgroup on EUCC for 
acting in tight collaboration with industry groups.

Best regards,

Pierre-Jean

From: [email protected]
When: 11:00 - 12:00 18 October 2023
Subject: Save the date - Eurosmart's comment on EUCC
Location: Microsoft Teams Meeting



________________________________________________________________________________
Microsoft Teams meeting
Join on your computer, mobile app or room device
Click here to join the 
meeting<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ODg0NGQ5ZjAtYjRiZS00MDgwLWExNDctNTVmMDhlZTcwOGNl%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2284f61714-2de2-44d4-90ea-7bc5aa825267%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%227bc3a0b9-e3a4-4c5b-a0ea-bb599303b742%22%7d>
Meeting ID: 348 334 115 041
Passcode: rXCzHT
Download Teams<https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/download-app> | 
Join on the web<https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-teams/join-a-meeting>
Learn More<https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting> | Meeting 
options<https://teams.microsoft.com/meetingOptions/?organizerId=7bc3a0b9-e3a4-4c5b-a0ea-bb599303b742&tenantId=84f61714-2de2-44d4-90ea-7bc5aa825267&threadId=19_meeting_ODg0NGQ5ZjAtYjRiZS00MDgwLWExNDctNTVmMDhlZTcwOGNl@thread.v2&messageId=0&language=en>
________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to