On 04/14/2015 02:01 PM, Lankswert, Patrick wrote: > Kevron, > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees at intel.com] >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 4:46 PM >> > To: Lankswert, Patrick >> > Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >> > Subject: Re: [dev] glib >> > >> > I wasn't aware that glib was being used for all multi-threaded platforms. >> > For >> > linux, this is almost a no-brainer, but you still have to throw the license >> > argument out the window. > > It is all good. Keep asking and challenging. If we can close these gaps and I > can get a lawyer to tell me that I am safe in the scenarios that I am > concerned about, we may be good. > >> > You could use c++11 threads/mutexes instead, however, you'll probably run >> > into the same problems on many platforms with dubious c++11 support. > Right. >
The C++11 support probably can't be used here. I'd thought about this for a moment, but glib is being used in the C-only realm of the code. It makes sense to keep that part more minimal. -- Jon A. Cruz - Senior Open Source Developer Samsung Open Source Group jonc at osg.samsung.com
