For those reading into this: Bill's concern is regarding the C++ API, and why it doesn't include ocstack.h in its doxygen generated documentation.
Bill, I believe the previous reason was that it was because the C++ API had intended to be separate from the C API altogether. However, the case for this was never pointed and hence I believe that the C++ API ended up using definitions from within ocstack.h directly, rather than enumerating it's own OCStackResults, etc. In short: Including ocstack.h into the C++ API Doxygen documentation is fine. I will '+1' your changeset. Thanks, Joey From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dieter, William R Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:02 PM To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: [dev] ocstack.h in API docs Is there a reason ocstack.h should not be included in the Doxygen API docs? Adding it do the Doxyfile the types and values defined in ocstack.h clickable in the docs, and clicking takes the reader to the value and the documentation for it. https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/811/3 Bill. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150423/a798f2f6/attachment.html>
