On Wednesday 11 February 2015 05:41:43 ??? wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Based on the previous ISG meeting result, I and mats (deputy lead architect)
> were discussing about directory restructuring. Attached file is our
> discussion result.
> This work is for alignment between IoTivity projects and directory
> structure. If you have any opinion about that, plz let me and mats know
> about that.
Hi Jinguk
Thanks for the post.
Before I can offer suggestions, I'd like to ask what our .so / .dll file
outputs
shall be. Will we have:
a) one DLL for the C SDK, one for the base discovery & connectivity, one (or
more) for service?
b) one DLL for the C SDK and one for the C++ bits?
c) one DLL for everything?
In any case, I'd like to suggest not having include directories, like I said
in another email. Those subdirs make it more difficult for people with dumber
editors and for viewing / reviewing online.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
