Uze,

If we are in agreement, how do you want to proceed regarding pulling the 
control-manager into master?

Pat

-----Original Message-----
From: Lankswert, Patrick 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:49 PM
To: Macieira, Thiago
Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: RE: [dev] Control Manager

Thiago,

I see your point.

Pat

-----Original Message-----
From: Macieira, Thiago
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:40 PM
To: Lankswert, Patrick
Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Control Manager

On Tuesday 27 January 2015 15:25:16 Lankswert, Patrick wrote:
> Thiago,
> 
> I am not sure that we are disagreeing. I see only one public form, the 
> contributed code.
> 
> Consider the case, that I contribute a bundle of source that may or 
> may not come from a code generator. If I contribute more source, does 
> it matter whether it came from a generator or from hand? I do not 
> think so, no matter where there code came from, it is my 
> responsibility to make the source code as a contribution suitable for 
> submission. If that means merging it with and preserving all of the 
> other contributions that were made since my last contributions, that is what 
> I must do.
> 
> In the above scenario, the tool is irrelevant, yes?

The difference is what you're modifying and whether you're following the spirit 
of the definition.

For example, if I use my IDE to generate the skeleton of a new class, even 
though they're generated, the new files are the preferred form of modification. 
I won't regenerate them again. But I am allowed to use the tool again to 
generate more new classes.

Similarly for us, we can use the tool again to generate new code, but we cannot 
use the tool to update the sources that were contributed before. That would be, 
at least, a violation of the spirit of the Open Source Definition and is 
probably enough to get us kicked out of Debian package repositories.

So I am recommending a hardline stance on this: it's ok to generate once, but 
then no one uses the tool again on the same files.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to