Cool! Its been pushed to master now.
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 11:44 +0000, ??? wrote: > Thank you, John. It works well for my work. > > > BR. Jihun Ha > > > ---?? ???--- > ??? : Light, John J/john.j.light at intel.com > ???? : 2015/07/01 00:01 (GMT+09:00) > ?? : RE: [dev] Need of URI with *port number* > Jihun, > > I submitted Patch 1430 to fix that issue. > > John Light > Intel OTC OIC Development > > > > From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org > [mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ??? > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:15 AM > To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: [dev] Need of URI with *port number* > > > > > Hi. All, > > > > Anyone knows why a port number has been disappeared in a response > information for findResource() request? > > Somewhere the port number is still a necessary information for certain > features like group action feature. > > Without the port number, any group action can not be executed well. > > > > Please help me to resolve this issues. > > > > > > ?????.?????. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Jihun Ha (???/???, Ph.D.) > > IoT, IoTivity, OIC| IoT Solution Lab > > Software R&D Center | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd > > Mobile +82 10 2533 7947 > > jihun.ha at samsung.com | jhha85 at gmail.com > > > > > > > > Image removed by sender. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
