June, Going forward, I would really prefer one contributor to be responsible for a feature. It is very hard to determine when a feature is done with one group is dependent on another group to complete a feature. Pat
From: ???(June Yong Young) [mailto:ju...@samsung.com] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:18 AM To: Kesavan, Vijay S; myeong.jeong at samsung.com; Lankswert, Patrick; Keane, Erich; 'DWARKAPRASAD DAYAMA(????)' Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: RE: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 Hi Vijay, Ok, That?s clear. Let?s remove BWT in 0.9.2 and we are going to tag ?0.9.2-RC2? today. But please let us know when you resolve all the RI layer problems. June Yong Young OIC Open Sourece WG Project Planning & Requirement TG Chair IoTivity Release Function Lead Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd. Software R&D Center, IoT Solution Lab. | Web & Convergence Team Principal Engineer T: +82-31-301-6107, M: +82-10-9530-6107 E-mail :juney at samsung.com From: Kesavan, Vijay S [mailto:vijay.s.kesa...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 3:10 PM To: juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>; myeong.jeong at samsung.com<mailto:myeong.jeong at samsung.com>; Lankswert, Patrick; Keane, Erich; DWARKAPRASAD DAYAMA(????) Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: RE: RE: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 The minor change I was referring to involves disabling/updating checks involving MAX_REQUEST_LENGTH and MAX_RESPONSE_LENGTH. This is one change I know off the top of my head, perhaps there are more changes that might be required. After all necessary changes are made all C/C++ APIs have to be tested with large payloads to fully exercise BWT. The RI test team cannot ramp-up/design/implement/run BWT test cases in a short time frame. --Vijay From: ???(June Yong Young) [mailto:ju...@samsung.com] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 9:47 PM To: myeong.jeong at samsung.com<mailto:myeong.jeong at samsung.com>; Kesavan, Vijay S; Lankswert, Patrick; Keane, Erich; DWARKAPRASAD DAYAMA(????) Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: RE: RE: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 Hi Vijay, When do you expect to resolve the issues on RI layer? If you can fix the problems within 1 day, then we can wait for the patches, but if not, I think we have to remove the Block-wise transfer on 0.9.2. (The thing is BWT is in the scope of 0.9.2 that is delivered to SWG.) Regards June June Yong Young OIC Open Sourece WG Project Planning & Requirement TG Chair IoTivity Release Function Lead Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd. Software R&D Center, IoT Solution Lab. | Web & Convergence Team Principal Engineer T: +82-31-301-6107, M: +82-10-9530-6107 E-mail :juney at samsung.com From: ??? [mailto:myeong.je...@samsung.com] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 11:53 AM To: Kesavan, Vijay S; ???; Lankswert, Patrick; Keane, Erich Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: Re: RE: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 Vijay. I'm really afraid of keeping due date for v0.9.2 Of course, we can handle it. But, it isn't possible to finish on time, I think, We have to find which parts should be changed, and what is the right direction to enable BWT in RI layer.. Because we don't know about 'some minor changes' that you said.. I think we need at least a couple of days to find and change it.. And, actually I think, you can do this more effectively better than us if June decides to give some time for it, right ? June, Pat What do you think about it ? Thanks. Best Regards, --- MyeongGi Jeong Senior Engineer, Software Architect Software R&D Center, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. +82-10-3328-1130 ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Kesavan, Vijay S<vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com<mailto:vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com>> Date : 2015-07-25 08:37 (GMT+09:00) Title : RE: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 With regards to BWT, my understanding is that the feature has been tested and sample applications have been provided only at the CA layer. The resource introspection layers requires some minor changes to enable BWT, and additionally testing/sample applications are is required at the C/C++ layer. MJ ? are these (RI changes, sample apps, validation at RI) going to be handled by your team? Regards, --Vijay From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org> [mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ???(June Yong Young) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:31 PM To: Lankswert, Patrick; myeong.jeong at samsung.com<mailto:myeong.jeong at samsung.com>; Keane, Erich Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: Re: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 If there only a few fixes are required, then let?s go forward with BWT feature included in 0.9.2 June Yong Young OIC Open Sourece WG Project Planning & Requirement TG Chair IoTivity Release Function Lead Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd. Software R&D Center, IoT Solution Lab. | Web & Convergence Team Principal Engineer T: +82-31-301-6107, M: +82-10-9530-6107 E-mail :juney at samsung.com From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org> [mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Lankswert, Patrick Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 1:21 AM To: myeong.jeong at samsung.com<mailto:myeong.jeong at samsung.com>; Keane, Erich Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: Re: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 MJ, No worries. I am ok with it if we get an approval from June and the test engineering folks. Luckily your feature is hidden from the API. Otherwise, I would have to get an approval from more folks like documentation, etc. June, Jawid and other QA folks, Other than Jawid, who should provide approval for late feature inclusion? Can I get an approval for MJ?s work of 0.9.2? It is in master. It needs a few fixes, but is looking good. If we delay the decision, we will not be able to run enough testing over his work for the release. So, please respond ASAP. Pat From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org> [mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ??? Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:07 PM To: Keane, Erich Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> Subject: Re: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 Hi, Erich. Thanks for rebasing and mergiing this changes.. And I understand what you said about applying master branch only.. I'll wait on June/Pat's decision, too. Thanks. Best Regards, --- MyeongGi Jeong Senior Engineer, Software Architect Software R&D Center, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. +82-10-3328-1130 ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Keane, Erich<erich.keane at intel.com<mailto:erich.keane at intel.com>> Date : 2015-07-23 01:11 (GMT+09:00) Title : Re: Re: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest 3 This patch is just about ready for master, there is need for antoher rebase, which I'm doing, but it seems like it should get in. I'll wait on Pat/June before cherry-pick however, my understanding is that June intentionally set the Feature-Freeze date however. On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 12:37 +0000, ??? wrote: > Hi,Erich. > > With Jon and you, blockwise transfer function review was finished and > merge-confict was resolved also. > > Please submit the changes to master branch.. > > And I'll inform this to June( Release mgmt function lead ) > > Thanks for review. > > > > June. > > Blockwise transfer function review was finished. > > I hope, Erich is going to submit this change to master branch soon.. > > And Samsung SQE team stared test for CA layer functions including BWT > also. > > ( already, some issues are registered in Jira ) > > We will resolve these issues as soon as possible. > > I think, except code cherry-pick time, there isn't any delaying factor > for 0.9.2 release.. > > ( Of course, you'd better ask to Pat about this. ) > > And there isn't unexpected effect to other functions by this change .. > > > > Thanks.. > > Best Regards, > > --- > > MyeongGi Jeong > > Senior Engineer, Software Architect > > Software R&D Center, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > +82-10-3328-1130 > > > > > > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > Sender : Keane, Erich > > Date : 2015-07-21 01:29 (GMT+09:00) > > Title : Re: [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for > Plugfest 3 > > > > My understanding is that the 17th was the feature freeze-date. It > would > be POSSIBLE to cherry-pick this fix into the 0.9.2 release branch, > however that would be up to the release team to decide. > > I'd not been aware that it was a major feature of the release though I > did try my best to get reviews in fast enough to make it > happen. We'll > continue reviewing and giong through the process as swiftly as > possible, > but the final decision is obviously up to others :) > > Thank you! > -Erich > > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 01:12 +0000, ??? wrote: > > Hi Erich. > > > > > > > > As you know, The Blockwise Transfer feature is currently reviewing > by > > community contributors. > > > > ( https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/1667/ ) > > > > And, it is also major feature of this release (v0.9.2), we ( with > DCTG > > members ) discussed thought the biweekly CC. > > > > The Samsung SQE team is going to start testing this feature and > report > > the result officially. > > > > I expect the review will be finished soon, then I'll inform you... > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > --- > > > > MyeongGi Jeong > > > > Senior Engineer, Software Architect > > > > Software R&D Center, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > > > +82-10-3328-1130 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > > > Sender : Keane, Erich > > > > Date : 2015-07-18 10:04 (GMT+09:00) > > > > Title : [dev] 0.9.2-dev Branch created, feature FREEZE for Plugfest > 3 > > > > > > > > Hi all- > > > > As you know, today is the feature-freeze for the Plugfest 3. I've > > created a branch to contain this version, which will receive > bug-fixes > > as they are discovered. Additionally, the tag 0.9.2-beta has been > > created to be used as a reference for validation. > > > > The major features of this release are: CBOR, Experimental IPv6 > > Support, > > Experimental Remote-Access Support. > > > > Currently, The Android server is having trouble PUT/POST requests. > > Additionally, the LOW QOS observation cancellation does not properly > > work throughout the stack, resulting in the server continuing to > send > > out notifications. > > > > For the RI/CA layers, please continue to submit fixes to all bugs to > > master (noting that they apply to the 0.9.2-dev branch), and I will > > cherry-pick them to the branch. If your patch applies ONLY to the > > 0.9.2-dev branch you'll be required to explain to Pat why that is > the > > case, and we'll discuss it from there. > > > > General feature-development can still be contributed to master, > though > > they will not be included in the Plugfest 3 release. > > > > Validation: Feel free to test the 0.9.2-dev branch or the 0.9.2-beta > > tag, though note that the former will be changing with bug-fixes. I > > anticipate a number of bug fixes and a -rc1 sometime next week. > > > > Thank you all for your contributions, and have a great weekend! > > > > -Erich > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > iotivity-dev mailing list > > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at > > lists.iotivity.org> > > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > [cid:image001.gif at 01D0C85B.F7AFD820] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150727/d5e8286a/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150727/d5e8286a/attachment.gif>
