Thanks Patrick, I will give it a try.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Lankswert, Patrick <
patrick.lankswert at intel.com> wrote:

>  Cesar,
>
>
>
> Walking the code, it looks like IoTClientResource::resource is bound to a
> fully qualified resource which means that the message is going out unicast.
> I **think** what you need to do is create a resource using the resource
> factory (I **think** it is called constructResourceObject (?)) with the
> multicast address.
>
>
>
> NOTE: Unless you want to know who is out there, you will not need to do a
> resource discovery. All resources that match the URI should receive the
> message.
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> *From:* Cesar Meira [mailto:cesarsulteste1 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:45 AM
> *To:* ???(Uze Choi)
> *Cc:* Lankswert, Patrick; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dev] Broadcast messages
>
>
>
> @Patrick
>
> Short answer: its in the main.cpp of the client, when I call
> redLed->put(1) and redLed->put(0).
>
> Long answer: I tried to code in a way that it should be easy to add or
> change resources like leds, buttons, buzzers and so on.
>
>
>
> In the client, the IoTClient object will initialize the IoTivity as client
> and will call IoTClientResourceManager::initialize(). This manager will
> basically call the IoTClientResource::initialize() from all resources
> present in list. The RedLed resource object inherits from
> IoTClientResource. I did this way so the resource objects, like RedLed,
> will only need to implement the put(), post(), get() and the replies,
> leaving the IoTivity specific routines to IoTClientResource.
>
> The "easyness" is that, if I want to implement another resource, like
> "GreenLed", all I have to do is inherit it from IoTClientResource,
> implement the virtual methods (initialize and put/get/post replies) and the
> resource specific put/get/post methods, and add an instance of this object
> in the IoTClientResourceManager list.
>
> The server side works in a similar way. The class names are a little
> different because I coded them first and forgot to update them later.
>
> It might not be really a broadcast message. The client is sending a
> message to the "/red_led" endpoint, and I expected that all servers that
> registered this endpoint would receive this message, but that was not the
> case.
>
> @Uze
>
> I think the second case is more like I want to accomplish. Using your
> example of the fire alarm, what is in my mind is this:
>
> There are smoke sensors, sirens and flash lights in this fire alarm
> system, all in the IoTivity network. If one of the smoke sensors detect
> smoke, it would send a message to the network, pretty much like "I have
> detected smoke". The sirens and the flash lights would receive this message
> from the network and go off.
>
> I guessed using the endpoint would be the way to do this. The sirens and
> flash light would all try to register the endpoint "/alarm", and the smoke
> sensor, knowing that, would send a message to this endpoint.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:09 AM, ???(Uze Choi) <uzchoi at samsung.com> wrote:
>
>   ?sending message into n device? could be interpreted into two cases.
>
>
>
> One is the after finding the devices and send to them.
>
>            e.g) find the ?notification alarm? resource and send the
> message to them as single shot.
>
>            ? This need to be handled from the Group concept.
>
> The other is broadcasting the message in to the network.
>
> e.g) fire alarm message need to be sent as a single messaging.
>
>            ? We can think about the new special resource which receives
> the broadcast(multicast) message except the advertisement presence message.
>
>
>
> Cesar, what is yours?
>
>
>
> BR, Uze Choi
>
> *From:* iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:
> iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org] *On Behalf Of *Lankswert, Patrick
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:59 PM
> *To:* Cesar Meira
>
>
> *Cc:* iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> *Subject:* Re: [dev] Broadcast messages
>
>
>
> Cesar,
>
>
>
> It was not obvious to me where you were attempting to send a broadcast.
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> *From:* Cesar Meira [mailto:cesarsulteste1 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 10, 2015 7:45 AM
> *To:* Lankswert, Patrick
> *Cc:* iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> *Subject:* Re: [dev] Broadcast messages
>
>
>
> Sure, I have attached the client and server codes.
>
> Any questions please let me know, and thanks for your time!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Lankswert, Patrick <
> patrick.lankswert at intel.com> wrote:
>
>  Cesar,
>
>
>
> It should work with caveats. Can you share the code that you are using to
> broadcast the message?
>
>
>
> Here are the caveats:
>
> ?         Broadcast message cannot be confirmed since you do not know who
> will receive it in advance
>
> ?         UDP and the broadcast (multicast) methods are best effort and
> therefore packets may be lost although very unlikely on a local network
> with a modern switch
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> *From:* iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:
> iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org] *On Behalf Of *Cesar Meira
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 09, 2015 9:21 AM
> *To:* iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> *Subject:* [dev] Broadcast messages
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I did a little 'hello world' application using IoTivity, sending a command
> to a device to turn a led on and off. The server runs in a Raspberry Pi and
> the client in a Linux notebook.
>
> The application did okay with this configuration. But then I tried to push
> a little forward and added another Raspberry Pi, with the exactly same code
> as the previous one. The objective was to test if the client could send
> "broadcast messages", and if similar devices could receive them.
>
> I set both RPis to register the endpoint "/red_led". My idea was that when
> the client sends a command "turn on" to endpoint "/red_led", both RPis
> would receive this command, but in the end only one of them received the
> message.
>
> So, is there a way to send a single broadcast message to "n" devices? Did
> I just misinterpreted the idea of the endpoint?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150618/274e6e41/attachment.html>

Reply via email to