On Thursday 18 June 2015 13:40:58 Hauke.Mehrtens at lantiq.com wrote: > What is the opinion on adding some option where IoTivity does not do its > architecture specific changes to CPPFLAGS and similar flags? In this mode > someone from the outside has to provide these information.
My opinion is that this should be the default and only mode. Any build options such as disabling of the C++ API or the primitive services need to be options of their own, as opposed to implied from the architecture. But this is just my opinion, I can't make the decision. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
