Hi Thiago,
I'd like to continue the discussion regarding OSWG Action item "Link to continue the discussion on technical details regarding the format of an ActionSet." This is the presentation used in OIC meeting. Thiago, Let?s continue discussion. Hyunjun.Kim designed this Group Action feature will respond it. BR, Uze Choi -----Original Message----- From: Thiago Macieira [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 4:29 AM To: moonki1.hong at samsung.com Cc: oeverson at vtmgroup.com; ??? Subject: Re: [Request to Check - by 18:00 on Mar.3rd in PST] Draft Action Item (with Deadline and Owner) after OSWG F2F Meeting in Santa Clara Hi Moonki, Olivia Thanks for the clarification on the first item (other email). We were discussing which OSes we wanted to support. Olivia, was the priority list I mentioned there captured anywhere? I had the POSIX as first priority, followed by Windows, but I can't remember what else we had discussed. As for the second item, Uze, when you have a chance, can you send a link to more information? On Thursday 05 March 2015 08:02:13 ??? wrote: > Dear Thiago, > > I'm sorry for the late reply. There are bunch of emails that I have > gotten during the last few days. > 1. ISG to make a decision on which development platforms tool to use > => I tried to figure out what it truly means, but failed. > So, Olivia, if possible, could you clarify this action item more > in detail? > 2. Link to continue the discussion on technical details regarding the > format of an ActionSet. => Uze presented the Group Action proposal in > IoTivity > v0.9.X1 feature session, and you raised the issue about the string > format of the ActionSet in his document. > Regards, > Moonki > > ------- Original Message ------- > Sender : Thiago Macieira< <mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com> > thiago.macieira at intel.com> > Date : 2015-03-04 01:58 (GMT+09:00) > Title : Re: [Request to Check - by 18:00 on Mar.3rd in PST] Draft > Action Item (with Deadline and Owner) after OSWG F2F Meeting in Santa > Clara Hi Moonki > > Do you have more context for the two items that are assigned to Uze > and to me? They were probably assigned as a result of some discussion. > Without the context, I'm not sure what we were asking for. > > On Tuesday 03 March 2015 05:19:24 you wrote: > > Dear all (potential) OIC correspondents relating to OSWG action > > items, > > > > > > > > This is Moonki from Samsung. The attached is the draft action item > > list from the last OSWG F2F meeting in Santa Clara. Please give us > > any comment on the listed items and their deadline. (by Mar. 3rd, at > > 6 PM in PST) Especially, please clarify the items that are expressed in > > yellow rows. > > Regards, > > Moonki > > > > > > > > Moonki Hong (???/???, Ph.D.) > > IoT Solution Lab.?Web & Convergence Team Software R&D Center?Samsung > > Electronics Co., Ltd Mobile +82 10 6255 6629?Office +82 31 279 1168 > > moonki1.hong at samsung.com?hongkel82 at gmail.com Force without > > wisdom fails of its own weight - Horace BC 65 - BC 27 > > > > > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > > Moonki Hong (???/???, Ph.D.) > IoT Solution Lab.?Web & Convergence Team Software R&D Center?Samsung > Electronics Co., Ltd Mobile +82 10 6255 6629?Office +82 31 279 1168 > moonki1.hong at samsung.com?hongkel82 at gmail.com Force without > wisdom fails of its own weight - Horace BC 65 - BC 27 > -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center -------------- next part -------------- HTML ?????? ??????????????... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150306/357f2c63/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 136862 bytes Desc: ?????? ?? ????????. URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150306/357f2c63/attachment.png>
