Funny discussion...afaik most OS has IPv6 stack and users can enable this interface whenever necessary. But the limitation of IPv6 deployment until now is lack of use cases even if IPv6 has lots of good features against IPv4.
So what sorts of use cases are you guys considering with IPv6 mandatory in IoTivity? Daniel, Soohong Daniel Park, Ph.D. Samsung Software R&D Center 2015. 3. 18. ?? 6:52? "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com>?? ??: > On Tuesday 17 March 2015 17:27:22 Stephane Lejeune wrote: > > Is the issue with the IPv6 maturity in FreeBSD or just with the default > > config? (Could this be enabled as part of the iotivity app/package > > installation?) > > Just the default config. One line in /etc/rc.conf and it turned back on. > > The point is that disabling of IPv6 is a common occurrence, out of > ignorance > more than anything. That might have served a purpose in the past, when > improperly configured networks were the norm. But it's turned into a > chicken- > and-the-egg problem: if no one turns IPv6 on, no one will find improperly > configured networks. > > Like I said, I don't know if we can mandate IP, even for smart home. > > But you're right (in the other email) that this is not an IoTivity > discussion. > We should take this back to OIC and have the discussion there. If we can > speed > up IPv6 deployment, we should. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150320/832d04ba/attachment.html>
