Hi Vijay,

"Early next week we will send an email to the reflector outlining the changes 
and actions that have to be taken by those using the APIs."
>> Could you share the API change context ASAP?
    To prepare the April release, primitive service should integrate with 
updated base layer by CA branch.
Thank you for your information sharing in advance.

BR, Uze Choi
-----Original Message-----
From: Kesavan, Vijay S [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 9:55 AM
To: uzchoi at samsung.com
Cc: Lankswert, Patrick; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: RE: [API change info sharing request] RE: Change in iotivity[master]: 
Redefine and implement findResource API

Uze,

With regards to your questions, as discussed previously, the first version of 
Iotivity with CA will support selecting the connection type in relevant APIs.  
Additionally, there will be support to distinguish the same resource discovered 
on multiple interfaces using a unique identifier, the server ID.  These 
features along with sample applications are already implemented in the CA 
branch.

Yes, there are differences between the master and CA APIs (C & C++), not very 
extensive, and when CA is merged with master the APIs will need update.  Early 
next week we will send an email to the reflector outlining the changes and 
actions that have to be taken by those using the APIs.

On an unrelated but relevant note, perhaps you are following the discussion 
threads in the mailing list suggesting how to handle multiple interfaces.  Some 
of the suggestion are reasonable and when incorporated are expected to result 
in additional API changes.

Regards,
--Vijay

-----Original Message-----
From: ???(Uze Choi) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:54 PM
To: Kesavan, Vijay S
Cc: Lankswert, Patrick; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: RE: [API change info sharing request] RE: Change in iotivity[master]: 
Redefine and implement findResource API

Hi, Vijay

Regarding the previous question, I haven't got the response yet.
May I expect your explanation? 
First of all, please Let me clear there is any difference the base layer API 
between the master branch and  connectivity abstraction branch.

BR, Uze Choi
-----Original Message-----
From: ???(Uze Choi) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 1:06 PM
To: Kesavan, Vijay S (vijay.s.kesavan at intel.com)
Cc: 'Patrick Lankswert'; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: [API change info sharing request] RE: Change in iotivity[master]: 
Redefine and implement findResource API

Hi Vijay,

Could you share the Base Layer API change according to the CA layer merging?
As far as I know, two feature were discussed.
 - connectivity selection
 - host parameter to identify the Resource Server/Clients are same one 
according to the different connectivity.
And status together whether implemented or be planned.

BR, Uze Choi
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerrit Code Review [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 2:52 AM
To: Caiwen Zhang
Cc: Uze Choi; Patrick Lankswert; jenkins-iotivity
Subject: Change in iotivity[master]: Redefine and implement findResource API

>From Erich Keane <erich.keane at intel.com>:

Erich Keane has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: Redefine and implement findResource API 
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

The parameters are all supposed to be part of the spec, I don't think they were 
ever implemented correctly in the C stack however, so the C++ stack kinda 
punted.

We definitely need to revisit this and see whats up.

--
To view, visit https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/321
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1ca7ea0ec6114b661aee7c83f0fe4567784b3a56
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: iotivity
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Caiwen Zhang <caiwen.zhang at intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Erich Keane <erich.keane at intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Patrick Lankswert <patrick.lankswert at intel.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Uze Choi <uzchoi at samsung.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: jenkins-iotivity <jenkins-iotivity at opendaylight.org>
Gerrit-HasComments: No


Reply via email to