Thiago,

I thought that this was part of the network interface work that you, John and 
Doug were discussing, but I had not seen the enumeration logic. It sounds like 
you are covering it. Thanks.

Pat

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Macieira, Thiago
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 11:07 AM
> To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> Cc: Lankswert, Patrick
> Subject: Re: [dev] Simple client/server in C
> 
> On Wednesday 06 May 2015 14:47:02 Lankswert, Patrick wrote:
> > Do we have a plan to transition to network interface enumeration? I
> > think that the transition away from the ethX and wlanX pattern in the
> > linux kernel happened a long time ago. The udev rules support mapping
> > back to ethX or other is distro driven and, therefore, not dependable.
> >
> > I regret on catching this sooner.
> 
> Well, the distinction should go away when the Ethernet/Wifi ? IP merger
> happens, so I don't think there's much action to be done here.
> 
> In any case, we cannot reliably depend on interface names anyway since
> they are freeform. You can easily rename yours:
> 
>  ip link set dev wlp2s0 name foobar1
> 
> I have a udev rule so that the USB dongle I use in the office gets the name
> usb0 because I was tired of having to read enp0s20u1u1 or enp0s20u0u1.
> 
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 7198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150506/22501cbc/attachment.p7s>

Reply via email to