Harish, I appreciate your point of view, but actually having the application take over control of the notification is a bad idea. The behavior of observation is very clear and not negotiable. Leaving this behavior to the application opens the door for violation of software/network standard contract and should be discouraged. If you want a behavior that is like observe, but not exactly observe, you should design an alternate notification mechanism. That said, I will look at your changes. If they do not break the observe contract, I will accept them. Pat
From: Harish Kumara Marappa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 5:56 AM To: Lankswert, Patrick Cc: uzchoi at samsung.com; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Adding address and port information for ObservationInfo structure. Hi Mr. Patrick, We have requirement in simulator module of providing more information about observer rather than just giving the observation id. >From application point of view it make sense if user has more information >about observer to take the control of notifying his interested observers. We have modified RI C++ layer in the same regard and submitted patch for review https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/2323/. Please provide your inputs on the change set. Regards, Harish Kumara M [cid:image001.gif at 01D0E4A6.953E0C40] [Image removed by sender.] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150901/2361db16/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ~WRD000.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: ~WRD000.jpg URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150901/2361db16/attachment.jpg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150901/2361db16/attachment.gif>
