Hi Uze, I am not saying or suggesting that it is an Iotivity only issue.
I am suggesting that if I understood the problem correctly then may be spec can help with other approaches. Ravi Subramaniam Principal Engineer Intel - (408) 765-3566 On Apr 18, 2016, at 12:12 AM, ???(Uze Choi) <uzchoi at samsung.com<mailto:uzchoi at samsung.com>> wrote: Hi Ravi, Ok, I got it, this could be IoTivity specific issue. During reboot the device. most of case, IP will be same in the local network. For the same port, there are two approaches. One, is to store the previously assigned port. The other is to use registered port. IoTivity have decided to use the registered port for several reasons. (second option) In this case I?m not sure to define the port name with ocf naming. BR, Uze Choi From: cftg at openconnectivity.org<mailto:cftg at openconnectivity.org> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Subramaniam, Ravi Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 3:38 PM To: uzchoi at samsung.com<mailto:uzchoi at samsung.com>; 'Michael Koster'; 'Aja Murray'; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>; cftg at openconnectivity.org<mailto:cftg at openconnectivity.org> Subject: RE: [cftg] RE: OCF IANA Port Number Assignment Hi Uze, I recognize that each stack for multiple instances may require an individual port (each instance does not always need to have individual port but let?s assume they do). I don?t understand why these need to be registered ports. Also what happens in a situation where there are more than the 5 instances (wouldn?t we have issues because we would have run out of reserved ports?)
