Dear Sung-Kyu, Thank you for your reply.
I also agree that removing preprocessor directive is not a good permanent solution. I temporarily blocked those preprocessor directives just for conformance testing. I hope that this bug will be fixed soon. Thanks & regards - Kevin From: Sung-Kyu Ko [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 9:14 PM To: Joo-Chul Lee <cms.rune at gmail.com>; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: Re: [dev] [cftg] Re: Question regarding ITT test case Dear Kevin, It looks a IoTivity defect so we made a JIra ticket : https://jira.iotivity.org/browse/IOT-1090 I guess that "SRMInitSecureResponses()" is not called in Arduino code because IoTivity Arduino does not support security feature. However it should not affect to "/oic/d" basic action. I don't think removing preprocessor block is a good solution. Thanks & BR, Sungkyu Ko. ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Joo-Chul Lee<cms.rune at gmail.com <mailto:cms.rune at gmail.com> > Date : 2016-04-25 15:41 (GMT+09:00) Title : Re: [dev] [cftg] Re: Question regarding ITT test case Dear Muhammad, Thank you for your comment. Now it works! "testdata" was magic keyword! By the way, could you help me solve another issue? I have posted below mail about virtual resource "/oic/d" before. but, nobody has replied to this mail yet. Do you know someone who can handle this issue? ------------------------------------------------------------ Hello folks, I am testing iotivity server codes on arduino with ITT now. While I'm testing this, I found some problem; The IoTivity server for "arduino" can't handle virtual resource (/oic/d). When client sends request like below, server just returns error (4.00; bad request). =================== TE --------> Get Request --------> DUT Protocol Type : COAP Destination URI : 192.168.100.185:55555/oic/d Confirmable Type : True Query : if=oic.if.r =================== I tried to find where the problem happened and I found: Since "SRMInitSecureResponses()" is not called while OCInit() is running, server couldn't get device id and finally it failed to send response to request for "/oic/d". <ocstack.c> initResources() { ... #ifndef WITH_ARDUINO if (result == OC_STACK_OK ) { result = SRMInitSecureResources(); } #endif ... } After removing preprocessor directives, server returns response correctly. Is this a bug? or is there some reason? Thanks & regards ------------------------------------------------------------ thanks & regards, - Kevin On 04/25/2016 01:49 PM, Muhammad Mushfiqul Islam wrote: Dear Mr. Kevin, Looks like there was not enough information provided in the DUTDescriptor.json file to send the POST request. It was lacking testdata. Please use the DUTDescriptor I am attaching instead. - Thanks & Regards, Mushfiqul Islam Antu ------- Original Message ------- Sender : ??? <mailto:rune at etri.re.kr> <rune at etri.re.kr> Date : Apr 25, 2016 11:55 (GMT+09:00) Title : RE: [cftg] Re: [dev] Question regarding ITT test case Dear Muhammad, Thank you for your help! I attached "DUTDescriptor.json, log.html, *.pcapng file". It includes two test cases: CT1_2_3::1, CT1_2_3::5. CT1_2_3::1 failed, however I don't know reason. CT1_2_3::5 succeeded, but I don't see "POST" message in *.pcapng file. I hope you will find the reason, please... :-) Thanks & regards, - Kevin _____ From: cftg at openconnectivity.org <mailto:cftg at openconnectivity.org> [cftg at openconnectivity.org <mailto:cftg at openconnectivity.org> ] on behalf of Muhammad Mushfiqul Islam [i.mushfiq at samsung.com <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 9:44 PM To: Joo-Chul Lee Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org <mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> ; cftg at openconnectivity.org <mailto:cftg at openconnectivity.org> Subject: [cftg] Re: [dev] Question regarding ITT test case Dear Mr. Kevin, Can you please provide the wireshark logs and the html report generated in the "bin/linux/ConformanceTestTool/testreport" folder? Then I would be able provide you better help to understand what is going wrong. Also, have you configured the DUTDescriptor.json file according to your testing device? By the way, even though it is not mentioned in the test procedure, ITT first sends GET request to resources prior sending POST request, to ensure it is trying to update the resource representation with a new value. - Thanks & Regards, Mushfiqul Islam Antu ------- Original Message ------- Sender : Joo-Chul Lee <mailto:cms.rune at gmail.com> <cms.rune at gmail.com> Date : Apr 22, 2016 16:56 (GMT+09:00) Title : [dev] Question regarding ITT test case Hello, folks I'm currently testing our codes with "ITT (IoTivity Test Tool) (https://wiki.iotivity.org/conformance_test_tool)". While I'm running ITT test case CT1_2_3, I face weird situation. Below is test description of CT1_2_3::1 ========================================= ... |procedure |1. CTT sends a unicast RETRIEVE request message (i.e. CoAP GET) to the IUT to the first supported OIC Resource. | ... |procedure |2. IUT receives the request message and sends a unicast response message to the CTT. | ... |procedure |3. CTT creates a list of current values for each supported Property. | ... |procedure |4. CTT sends a unicast CON UPDATE request message (i.e. CoAP POST) to the IUT with no OIC Resource Interface specified to the first writable supported Property (excluding common Properties rt, if, p, n, etc.) on the first supported OIC Resource. The Property value to be written must be valid (e.g. within the allowable range, valid enumeration value, etc.) and must be different than the current Property value. | ... |procedure |5. IUT receives the request message and verifies that it is valid (i.e. Can the Property be updated? Does the OIC Resource Interface support UPDATE requests? Etc.) | ... |procedure |6a. If the request message is valid, the IUT shall update the target OIC Resource Property as requested and send a successful UPDATE response message to CTT using the appropriate OIC Resource Interface. | ... |procedure |6b. If the request is not valid, the IUT shall not update the target OIC Resource Property and shall send an appropriate error message to CTT.. | ... |procedure |7. CTT receives the response message and caches it for later evaluation. | ... |procedure |8. CTT sends a unicast CON RETRIEVE request message (i.e. CoAP GET) to the first supported OIC Resource of the IUT. | ... |procedure |9. IUT receives the request message and sends a RETRIEVE response message to CTT. | ... |procedure |10. CTT receives the response message and caches it for later evaluation. | ... |procedure |11. Repeat steps 1 to 10 for all other writable Properties supported by the OIC Resource. | ... |procedure |12. Repeat steps 1 to 11 for all other OIC Resources supported by the IUT. | ... |post_condition |None | ... |expected| Check 1. The IUT shall indicate support for CBOR and payload encoding shall use CBOR unless a different content type (i.e. JSON) has been negotiated (8.1 CRUDN Overview [CORE], 7.2.1.2 Resource interface property definition [CORE]). | ... |expected| Check 3. The IUT shall send a response code of "2.04 Changed" (for CoAP) when the Property value has been successfully updated in Step 6a (8.1 CRUDN Overview [CORE], 12.2.1 Mapping of CRUDN to CoAP. Overview [CORE]). | ... |expected| Check 4. The Property(s) and its value from the UPDATE request message shall be included in the response from Step 6a (5.2.1.2 Update behavior [RT]. | ... |expected| Check 5. The value UPDATED in Step 4 and the value RETRIEVED in Step 10 shall be the same (8.4.2 Update. Processing by the OIC Server [CORE]). | ... |expected| Check 7. In the absence of an "if" query the Default Interface shall be used (7.1.4.2.3 OIC Resource Interface [CORE]). | ... |expected| Check 10. Every message with a payload body shall contain a Content-Format option with a numeric value from Table 32 (12.2.3 Content Type negotiation [CORE]). | ========================================= According to the test description of CT1_2_3::1, CTT (I mean ITT) will send CON UPDATE request message (== CoAP POST message), however I can't see any POST message, rather I could only find GET messages. Is this situation ok, or am I doing something wrong about this? Thanks & regards - Kevin _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org <mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev <http://ext.samsung.net/mailcheck/SeenTimeChecker?do=88b6a78ac05616df24808cdb0cf93f2f033e98031636693600185c706e925d20557ff92c0671275f7167a308fea3079b1b20909a04efd4d2748cfe1d4e847419cf878f9a26ce15a0> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160425/5e7f62b3/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 13168 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160425/5e7f62b3/attachment.gif>
