On segunda-feira, 1 de agosto de 2016 17:39:17 PDT Dave Thaler via iotivity- dev wrote: > As discussed in the OCF Architecture TG (see CR 49), I see no reason for ?p? > and ?eps? to ever appear in the same response or example.
Wouldn't the "p" be necessary for backwards compatibility with OIC 1.1 clients? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
