On sexta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2016 10:58:12 PDT ?? wrote: > Hi.. > > one week for this big change is too small and we should see how it effects > the products after new protocol stacks..
One week is sufficient for people to notice there's a discussion going on and at least send an email. When the discussion dies down, it means there's consensus coming. > Overwhelming is subjective .. I know how it difficult to maintain the source > and do releases from open source perspective... may be others might not > seen it.. Just count the number of people supporting it. That's objective and way more than majority. > once new source starts supporting new connecticities like BT.. BLE as > current Iotivity .. it eventually becomes current Iotivity or similar if > we keep architecture principles such as layers.. BLE is not an objective right now, since it's not part of the spec. Let me repeat: the current implementation does not address the market. To address the market, we can either make the current implementation do it or add a new one. Is it ok to indefinitely suspend the IoTivity 1.3 release until we're done changing everything inside? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
